shorter GRP3 units?

archae86
archae86
Joined: 6 Dec 05
Posts: 3157
Credit: 7212744931
RAC: 980144
Topic 197641

One of my hosts recently completed a CPU GRP3 result in about a third of the elapsed and CPU time expected from recent results. While I suspect it had experienced an error condition, the quorum partner did the work on an Nvidia GPU, also in about a third his recent time, and the WU pair validated and were awarded 177.69 credit, somewhat less than a third the recent standard value of 660.0.

Is this a sea change in Gamma Ray Pulsar #3 work?

Gary Roberts
Gary Roberts
Moderator
Joined: 9 Feb 05
Posts: 5872
Credit: 117249715312
RAC: 36191601

shorter GRP3 units?

Quote:
Is this a sea change in Gamma Ray Pulsar #3 work?


No, it's a change in the data file on which the latest tasks are based.

Until quite recently and for about 2 months, we've being doing tasks based on a data file named LATeah0092C.dat. In quick succession, we've now gone through 93C, 94C and are currently on 95C. Each time there is a new data file there will be tasks that Bernd refers to as "short ends" or "corner cases" which take a lot less than the standard time to crunch. If you search for those terms, I'm sure you'll find previous posts from Bernd where he has explained the situation.

There seem to be a bunch of "short ends" immediately after a new data file comes into use, which is why you'll be seeing them right now.

Cheers,
Gary.

archae86
archae86
Joined: 6 Dec 05
Posts: 3157
Credit: 7212744931
RAC: 980144

RE: Each time there is a

Quote:
Each time there is a new data file there will be tasks that Bernd refers to as "short ends" or "corner cases" which take a lot less than the standard time to crunch. If you search for those terms, I'm sure you'll find previous posts from Bernd where he has explained the situation.


Thanks. Searching for "short ends" got me to this Bernd message for example.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.