Finally ran down the cache of 3.05 tasks on my quad and can confirm what I saw on the laptop: The 3.07 app runs 30% slower (6.5h to 9h and 8.3h to 11h, respectively) with no change in credit. Any reason for this?
The top Win host shows the same: before and after as examples.
The Linux hosts do not seem to have suffered similar drop in performance.
GW search tasks run in the same range as before.
[edit] Should have posted this in the sticky, apologies!
Copyright © 2024 Einstein@Home. All rights reserved.
Pulsar Search app v3.07 less efficient?
)
Hi!
Thanks for the report, I forwarded it to the devs.
Happy Crunching
Bikeman
I run only a windows host and
)
I run only a windows host and indeed 30% slower.
have any comments from the
)
have any comments from the developers?
why the 3.07 slower than 3.05?
RE: have any comments from
)
They needed something to make the CUDA Beta look good?
Only joking :-)
Hi! Yes, the devs are
)
Hi!
Yes, the devs are working on this, stay tuned. To make the matter more mysterious, it seems like the slowdown is far more noticeable on some systems than on average.
CU
Bikeman
Update: A new version was
)
Update:
A new version was released that should bring back the original performance.
Again, thanks for posting the report,
Happy crunching
Bikeman
RE: Update: A new version
)
Great, thanks for the quick work!
My quad had no tasks in cache but of course got six S5R5 tasks with its first request so it will be a while before I can see the difference.