new unit: the Sagan

LivingDog
LivingDog
Joined: 21 Nov 05
Posts: 97
Credit: 1792686
RAC: 0
Topic 194748

I would like to respectfully suggest that Sagan be given a unit. It can be for distance or shear number of objects - like the numbers of stars in the sky is 1 Sagan. On is show "Cosmos" he often used the expression "billions upon billions." Perhaps 10^18 = 1 Sagan.

Granted this is vague, but nobody will listen so there ya' go.

-LD
________________________________________
my faith

Bikeman (Heinz-Bernd Eggenstein)
Bikeman (Heinz-...
Moderator
Joined: 28 Aug 06
Posts: 3522
Credit: 689410993
RAC: 221652

new unit: the Sagan

Quote:

I would like to respectfully suggest that Sagan be given a unit. It can be for distance or shear number of objects - like the numbers of stars in the sky is 1 Sagan. On is show "Cosmos" he often used the expression "billions upon billions." Perhaps 10^18 = 1 Sagan.

Granted this is vague, but nobody will listen so there ya' go.


Carl Sagan would really deserve this honor, but unfortunately, this is already taken: 10 ^18 is "Exa". I'm not sure what 10^27 is, tho...all smaller powers of 10^3 definitely have names already.

CU
Bikeman

Odd-Rod
Odd-Rod
Joined: 15 Mar 05
Posts: 38
Credit: 8007860
RAC: 76

RE: Carl Sagan would

Message 96742 in response to message 96741

Quote:

Carl Sagan would really deserve this honor, but unfortunately, this is already taken: 10 ^18 is "Exa". I'm not sure what 10^27 is, tho...all smaller powers of 10^3 definitely have names already.

I can't wait to get a 1 Saganbyte drive. :)
What about the abbreviation? Would that be a 1Sb drive? Unfortunately it looks a bit like 15b.

Mike Hewson
Mike Hewson
Moderator
Joined: 1 Dec 05
Posts: 6537
Credit: 286575241
RAC: 94512

RE: I can't wait to get a 1

Message 96743 in response to message 96742

Quote:
I can't wait to get a 1 Saganbyte drive. :)
What about the abbreviation? Would that be a 1Sb drive? Unfortunately it looks a bit like 15b.


Go for 1 SagaByte and 1 SaB ???? :-)

He may have often used the expression "billions upon billions", but who is to say of what item? Maybe he was referring to of billions ....

So 10^27 sounds good, as "billions upon billions of billions" - can't see him disapproving ....

Cheers, Mike.

I have made this letter longer than usual because I lack the time to make it shorter ...

... and my other CPU is a Ryzen 5950X :-) Blaise Pascal

Bikeman (Heinz-Bernd Eggenstein)
Bikeman (Heinz-...
Moderator
Joined: 28 Aug 06
Posts: 3522
Credit: 689410993
RAC: 221652

Still I think that astronomy

Message 96744 in response to message 96743

Still I think that astronomy has lost it's supremacy when it comes to big number to the banking sector...or soon will.
So maybe 10^27 will someday be called a Lehman or a Bernenke, who knows.

CU
HB

Mike Hewson
Mike Hewson
Moderator
Joined: 1 Dec 05
Posts: 6537
Credit: 286575241
RAC: 94512

RE: Still I think that

Message 96745 in response to message 96744

Quote:
Still I think that astronomy has lost it's supremacy when it comes to big number to the banking sector...or soon will.
So maybe 10^27 will someday be called a Lehman or a Bernenke, who knows.


Oh dear, we can't have that!

Perhaps we could auto-assign the bank numerals as having an implicit negative sign. We'll keep all the positive ones for astronomy.

That way :

1 Bear-Stearn < 1 Sagan

will always be true, regardless ...... :-)

Cheers, Mike.

I have made this letter longer than usual because I lack the time to make it shorter ...

... and my other CPU is a Ryzen 5950X :-) Blaise Pascal

Bikeman (Heinz-Bernd Eggenstein)
Bikeman (Heinz-...
Moderator
Joined: 28 Aug 06
Posts: 3522
Credit: 689410993
RAC: 221652

LOL. Excellent idea!! HB

LOL. Excellent idea!!

HB

Dirk Villarreal Wittich
Dirk Villarreal...
Joined: 13 Oct 07
Posts: 263
Credit: 434801
RAC: 0

Good idea LivingDog! What


Good idea LivingDog!
What about this definition?
The number of stars in our Milky Way Galaxy--->1 Sa
The name of the unit would be "Sagan"
The abbreviation would be Sa

С Новым Годом!

LivingDog
LivingDog
Joined: 21 Nov 05
Posts: 97
Credit: 1792686
RAC: 0

RE: Good idea

Message 96748 in response to message 96747

Quote:


Good idea LivingDog!
What about this definition?
The number of stars in our Milky Way Galaxy--->1 Sa
The name of the unit would be "Sagan"
The abbreviation would be Sa

...

(Sorry for the lateness of my reply, but)
(I am not getting email updates from the)
(board. Nonetheless, here I go.)

That looks great Dirk, but I would like to leave it as just 'S' b/c a Newton is just 'N'.

So maybe we can make it as you suggested with this amendment:


The number of stars in our Milky Way Galaxy = 1 S
The name of the unit would be "Sagan"
The abbreviation would be S.

We can compare our "familiar" galaxy to the number of stars in other galaxies. As we do with the solar mass, and the astronomical unit, the au.

e.g. the Andromeda galaxy has ~3.3 S., which would be read: "The Andromeda galaxy has approximately three point three Sagan."

Awesome. Let's you and me start a petition. ... how do we do that? :/

8]

-LD
________________________________________
my faith

Phil
Phil
Joined: 24 Feb 05
Posts: 176
Credit: 1817881
RAC: 0

RE: RE: Still I think

Message 96749 in response to message 96745

Quote:
Quote:
Still I think that astronomy has lost it's supremacy when it comes to big number to the banking sector...or soon will.
So maybe 10^27 will someday be called a Lehman or a Bernenke, who knows.

Oh dear, we can't have that!

Perhaps we could auto-assign the bank numerals as having an implicit negative sign. We'll keep all the positive ones for astronomy.

I dont know if we ought assign numerical descriptions to these people at all, can't we just keep the famous collective noun "a wunch of bankers"? ;-)

Mike Hewson
Mike Hewson
Moderator
Joined: 1 Dec 05
Posts: 6537
Credit: 286575241
RAC: 94512

RE: I dont know if we ought

Message 96750 in response to message 96749

Quote:
I dont know if we ought assign numerical descriptions to these people at all, can't we just keep the famous collective noun "a wunch of bankers"? ;-)


:-)

Well we have cardinal, ordinal, natural, integer, rational, irrational, real, imaginary, quaternion and complex numbers. Try stupid numbers? :-)

[ Stupid numbers don't commute. Which means when you give them money, you don't get it back. They are associative, which means they give the money to their associates. The distributive law also applies, bestowing their families. Finally there is the foreclosure property, where negative amounts are brought back to zero. ]

Cheers, Mike.

( edit ) As for the Sagan, I really like the idea of the number stars in our galaxy. It flows nicely from a solar mass or the astronomical unit. It's a 'natural' measure and simple to demonstrate - "look over there at that, it's one of those". Even better, it would be a pure number without units or dimensions.

Compare with a parsec, say, which is kludgy as it ultimately depends on the division of the circle into 360 degrees of arc etc.

I have made this letter longer than usual because I lack the time to make it shorter ...

... and my other CPU is a Ryzen 5950X :-) Blaise Pascal

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.