LISA should be when not if

joseph_boese
joseph_boese
Joined: 11 Feb 05
Posts: 10
Credit: 1578013
RAC: 0
Topic 194596

I still can't believe LISA is not a higher priority that it is (http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/area/index.cfm?fareaid=27). This project should not only be funded by now but should have already been launched. It is so much cheaper than the LHC and would produce just as knowledge. I could give a lot of background but anyone on this website probably has even more than I do. Gravity waves are the only way we will see past the last scattering to see the birth of the universe and may be one the few ways we can ever see the extra dimensions predicted by string theory as well as the predicted multiverses outside our deSitter space. Bottom line write your representatives and let them know LISA is so much worthwhile than more wasted defense spending, bailouts, etc.

hockeyguy
hockeyguy
Joined: 29 Aug 05
Posts: 85
Credit: 15622
RAC: 0

LISA should be when not if

I doubt Lisa will be realized anytime soon considering that our ability to measure gw is in doubt due to the potential graininess of space-time. Besides, we already have Ligo and Geo, neither of which has discovered anything, as far as I know.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.