Linux S5R2 App 4.21 available for Beta test

Bernd Machenschalk
Bernd Machenschalk
Moderator
Administrator
Joined: 15 Oct 04
Posts: 4,308
Credit: 249,958,327
RAC: 34,047
Topic 192690

A Linux App (4.21) is available from our Beta Test page. It fixes one possible source of the "SIGABRT" problem. As this is actually a combination of problems, I'm not sure this fix covers all of them. Please test and report in this thread.

BM

BM

Annika
Annika
Joined: 8 Aug 06
Posts: 720
Credit: 494,410
RAC: 0

Linux S5R2 App 4.21 available for Beta test

Just set it up as it was stated in the howto. It killed all my workunits (state file error), including one that was already more than 80% finished. As I never used a Beta or unofficial app before, I'm not quite sure if that is expected behaviour, but if it is, maybe one should put a warning into the howto. If I had known this, I would have waited the few extra hours... Sorry if this was a newbie mistake on my part, but one could still save others from making the same mistake then ;-)
Seems to be crunching okay now with new workunits and also survives a manual "update" which normally tended to send the WUs into Nirvana... no adverse effects from running the graphics or repeatedly suspending/resuming a result, either, so, this app is looking good. Let's see how it turns out in the long term.
Oh, to do this like a proper beta test ;-) a few infos on the system I'm testing on:
This is an AMD Athlon 3500+ with a Venice core (512 MB cache) running at the normal 2.2GHz and normally dead stable (used to run CPDN on it with no problems); it has 2 Gigs of memory and an NVidia Geforce graphics card for which I'm using the proprietary NVidia drivers. The OS is Debian 4.0 "Etch" with a 2.6.18 kernel.
This host has not been completely immune to "SIGABRT" problems in the past but got relatively few compared to what others reported (I think there were two since the beginning of the run).
I do hope this helps and I'll keep you posted!

Cheers, Annika

Bikeman (Heinz-Bernd Eggenstein)
Bikeman (Heinz-...
Moderator
Joined: 28 Aug 06
Posts: 3,522
Credit: 706,553,843
RAC: 660,493

Hi! Great news there's a

Hi!

Great news there's a possible fix!!

As indicated by Annika, I will first let my pipeline run dry before trying this one, tho.

Bernd, are you interested in any special kind of hosts to try this one on? OS should be Linux, I guess. Any other suggestions which host should be preferred when selecting one for the beta? AMD/Intel ? Single/Multi-core? fast/slow?

Keep up the good work,

BRM

DanNeely
DanNeely
Joined: 4 Sep 05
Posts: 1,364
Credit: 3,562,358,667
RAC: 0

RE: Bernd, are you

Message 63862 in response to message 63861

Quote:

Bernd, are you interested in any special kind of hosts to try this one on? OS should be Linux, I guess. Any other suggestions which host should be preferred when selecting one for the beta? AMD/Intel ? Single/Multi-core? fast/slow?

Probably all of the above since eventually the app'll be deployed to all of them if it works. Faster hosts might be a better place to start just to make sure its results validate.

Michael Karlinsky
Michael Karlinsky
Joined: 22 Jan 05
Posts: 888
Credit: 23,502,182
RAC: 0

RE: Just set it up as it

Message 63863 in response to message 63860

Quote:
Just set it up as it was stated in the howto. It killed all my workunits (state file error), including one that was already more than 80% finished. As I never used a Beta or unofficial app before, I'm not quite sure if that is expected behaviour, but if it is, maybe one should put a warning into the howto.

This one:

Quote:

WARNING: Switching the platform terminates all Results in progress with a client error. To avoid wasting CPU cycles or losing credits you may want to wait until a new Result is started.

There is a hack to Switch applications half way through a result

Michael

Bernd Machenschalk
Bernd Machenschalk
Moderator
Administrator
Joined: 15 Oct 04
Posts: 4,308
Credit: 249,958,327
RAC: 34,047

RE: Bernd, are you

Message 63864 in response to message 63861

Quote:
Bernd, are you interested in any special kind of hosts to try this one on? OS should be Linux, I guess. Any other suggestions which host should be preferred when selecting one for the beta? AMD/Intel ? Single/Multi-core? fast/slow?


The only difference relevant for the issue this App adresses is the Linux version (i.e. glibc), and possibly the graphics, not the hardware. A bleeding edge Linux distribution (e.g. from the Gentoo or Debian lines) and switching on graphics (*) should be the hardest test.

BM

(*) Actually running the graphics isn't necessary for testing, just the necessary libraries have to be installed to enable the graphics thread, which can be tested by switching on the graphics for a moment.

BM

Annika
Annika
Joined: 8 Aug 06
Posts: 720
Credit: 494,410
RAC: 0

Yes Michael, noticed that

Yes Michael, noticed that now. Guess I only looked at the Linux section... embarassing, normally I do read the manual before I do sth to my system. I'll have to excuse that with being a bit too enthusiastic about participating in this Beta test (and beat myself up about it in silence)...
Bernd, sth strange I noticed about the graphics: Normally they're active, but I just noticed they don't display now, even after restarting the manager. I had KDE closed for a while, could that be the reason? I had the graphics on for a few minutes just after installing the beta app and then everything was normal but now I can click the graphics button a hundred times and noting happens... is it the app or just my system? And does it mean sth significant?

Bernd Machenschalk
Bernd Machenschalk
Moderator
Administrator
Joined: 15 Oct 04
Posts: 4,308
Credit: 249,958,327
RAC: 34,047

RE: I had the graphics on

Message 63866 in response to message 63865

Quote:
I had the graphics on for a few minutes just after installing the beta app and then everything was normal but now I can click the graphics button a hundred times and noting happens... is it the app or just my system? And does it mean sth significant?


Thanks for spotting this. "Graphics only shows up first time" is an issue I have seen quite a while ago (rather years than months), it has to do with initialisation of the graphics libraries. Something changed in BOINC there since our S5R1 Apps, I'll look into it.

I think that most Linux instances are running rather unattended and not normally showing the graphics anyway, in particular as there isn't a BOINC screensaver for X11/Linux yet, so I'll not give this issue the highest priority right now. Is there any Linux user out there who normally enjoys the graphics?

BM

BM

Annika
Annika
Joined: 8 Aug 06
Posts: 720
Credit: 494,410
RAC: 0

Occasionally, but nothing I

Occasionally, but nothing I couldn't live without, especially as I usually have a Win box around aswell. So I agree this really isn't high-priority.

M. Schmitt
M. Schmitt
Joined: 27 Jun 05
Posts: 478
Credit: 15,872,262
RAC: 0

I installed the new app on

I installed the new app on one host and two virtual machines so far. I waited untill the actual unit was finished and uploaded, then, in case of a not self-reportig client, I updated the project to report finished WUs.

The remainig WUs in cache got killed, but the scheduler sent them back again. :)
This way, one can expect earlier results, if the WUs in cache are a couple of hours/day old.

So just wait till a new WU gets started and then update. Only a few seconds of work will be lost.

cu,
Michael

Annika
Annika
Joined: 8 Aug 06
Posts: 720
Credit: 494,410
RAC: 0

Not wanting to cry wolf or

Not wanting to cry wolf or sth, but atm it looks like this app is extremely slow on my box. This box used to finish 500-credit-WUs in hardly more than 100,000 seconds, which would be around 28 hours iirc (not just one large WU but at least half a dozen so far which should be halfway significant) but atm it has been crunching on a WU for more than 6 hours and it's only 10% done...
As I said, don't want to whine, or sound overly dramatic, but this box has never had performance issues under Linux so I thought I'd get back on this just to be on the safe side...

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.