invalid result bytecount / checksum differs
28 Feb 2005 15:57:29 UTC
Topic 188135
(moderation:
hi,
i'm using the optimized boinc athlon xp linux client from
http://www.pperry.f2s.com/downloads.htm
now it seems that all results are invalid with this error:
4.19
Fstats.Ha: bytecount 1950105 checksum 93605666
Fstats.Hb: bytecount 1909178 checksum 91616935
http://einsteinathome.org/task/1358689
is it a problem of the optimized client? is anyone using it with success?
invalid result bytecount / checksum differs
)
f'up to
http://einsteinathome.org/node/188052
> now it seems that all
)
> now it seems that all results are invalid with this error:
>
> 4.19
>
> Fstats.Ha: bytecount 1950105 checksum 93605666
> Fstats.Hb: bytecount 1909178 checksum 91616935
Not a problem or bug!
I have added something to the FAQ about this.
Bruce
Director, Einstein@Home
> Not a problem or
)
> Not a problem or bug!
Yes i have learnded that, thank you. But the problem is that all results the last two days are invalid.
> > Not a problem or bug! >
)
> > Not a problem or bug!
>
> Yes i have learnded that, thank you. But the problem is that all results the
> last two days are invalid.
Ouch!! I just looked at this and they are just over (and on the wrong side of) the boundary between valid and invalid. It appears to me that our validator is being slightly too conservative. It will take me a day or two to follow this up: we probably need to make the validator slightly more liberal.
Bruce
Director, Einstein@Home
> > > Not a problem or bug! >
)
> > > Not a problem or bug!
> >
> > Yes i have learnded that, thank you. But the problem is that all results
> the
> > last two days are invalid.
>
> Ouch!! I just looked at this and they are just over (and on the wrong side
> of) the boundary between valid and invalid. It appears to me that our
> validator is being slightly too conservative. It will take me a day or two to
> follow this up: we probably need to make the validator slightly more liberal.
great :)
regards
martin