Gravitational Wave search S6Bucket Follow-up #1 launched

Bernd Machenschalk
Bernd Machenschalk
Moderator
Administrator
Joined: 15 Oct 04
Posts: 4,289
Credit: 245,828,639
RAC: 10,637
Topic 197811

First 210 WUs issued for testing, "deadline" 3d while testing.

More tomorrow.

BM

BM

Highlander
Highlander
Joined: 1 Jul 05
Posts: 24
Credit: 141,220,706
RAC: 19

Gravitational Wave search S6Bucket Follow-up #1 launched

Don't know if this is directly related to this new release, but i hat a few bad gateway messages from boinc, but for the first time this:

http://einstein.phys.uwm.edu/host_sched_logs/2380/2380567

2014-11-20 17:40:50.7624 [PID=4906]   Request: [USER#xxxxx] [HOST#2380567] [IP xxx.xxx.xxx.3] client 7.2.42
2014-11-20 17:40:50.7625 [PID=4906 ] [CRITICAL]   Another scheduler instance [PID=2755] is running for this host
2014-11-20 17:40:50.7632 [PID=4906 ] [debug]   [HOST#2380567] MSG( low) Another scheduler instance is running for this host
2014-11-20 17:40:50.7633 [PID=4906 ]    Sending reply to [HOST#2380567]: 0 results, delay req 60.00
2014-11-20 17:40:50.7633 [PID=4906 ]    Scheduler ran 0.005 seconds

btw, no forced update at this time

edit:
oh, was only a small hiccup:

47838	Einstein@Home	20-11-2014 18:50	Sending scheduler request: To fetch work.	
47839	Einstein@Home	20-11-2014 18:50	Reporting 2 completed tasks	
47840	Einstein@Home	20-11-2014 18:50	Requesting new tasks for CPU and NVIDIA	
47841	Einstein@Home	20-11-2014 18:50	Scheduler request completed: got 11 new tasks	
47842	Einstein@Home	20-11-2014 18:50	Completed result p2030.20131112.G66.36+00.62.N.b4s0g0.00000_1760_1 refused: result already reported as success	
47843	Einstein@Home	20-11-2014 18:50	Resent lost task p2030.20131218.G181.70-02.90.S.b4s0g0.00000_2512_0	
etc...

from my POV, all is well again

MAGIC Quantum Mechanic
MAGIC Quantum M...
Joined: 18 Jan 05
Posts: 1,750
Credit: 1,144,787,821
RAC: 1,511,398

11/20/2014 1:49:09 PM |


11/20/2014 1:49:09 PM | Einstein@Home | No work is available for Gravitational Wave search S6Bucket Follow-up #1

None for me.

Donald A. Tevault
Donald A. Tevault
Joined: 17 Feb 06
Posts: 439
Credit: 73,516,529
RAC: 0

Okay, I got one. But, I got

Okay, I got one. But, I got it on an old P-IV era Xeon machine that has hyperthreading enabled. Right now, I'm seven hours and 11 minutes into it, and have just now gone over 10% completion. So, with only a three-day deadline, I'll be cutting it close.

astro-marwil
astro-marwil
Joined: 28 May 05
Posts: 521
Credit: 465,806,544
RAC: 997,046

Hallo BM! Are these new apps

Hallo BM!
Are these new apps running for test with high priority? I hope so.

Kind regards and happy crunching
Martin

Richard Haselgrove
Richard Haselgrove
Joined: 10 Dec 05
Posts: 2,142
Credit: 2,813,902,848
RAC: 840,100

RE: Hallo BM! Are these new

Quote:

Hallo BM!
Are these new apps running for test with high priority? I hope so.

Kind regards and happy crunching
Martin


That's not something the project can control. 'High Priority' is set by your local client if it needs to gueue-jump the task in order to meet the deadline.

floyd
floyd
Joined: 12 Sep 11
Posts: 133
Credit: 186,610,495
RAC: 0

RE: RE: Hallo BM! Are

Quote:
Quote:

Hallo BM!
Are these new apps running for test with high priority? I hope so.

Kind regards and happy crunching
Martin


That's not something the project can control. 'High Priority' is set by your local client if it needs to gueue-jump the task in order to meet the deadline.


... if it thinks it needs to ...
I'm sure this behaviour has intentionally been "encouraged" by the short deadline and it will likely change after the test phase. But then there's still the estimated run time which is currently vastly overestimated. The WUs seem to consist of several parts, each starting at 0% and running to an unpredictable percentage. I think this will make it hard to get reliable estimates.

Donald A. Tevault
Donald A. Tevault
Joined: 17 Feb 06
Posts: 439
Credit: 73,516,529
RAC: 0

This workunit is showing very

This workunit is showing very strange behavior. It keeps advancing to a certain percentage done, and then the Progress counter keeps getting reset to zero, and it starts over. Right now, after over 21 hours, it's showing at about 13% completion, with 240 hours left to go. My computer is number 6345035.

Strange workunit

Bernd Machenschalk
Bernd Machenschalk
Moderator
Administrator
Joined: 15 Oct 04
Posts: 4,289
Credit: 245,828,639
RAC: 10,637

Thanks. There might (still)

Thanks. There might (still) be something wrong with the progress accounting. However the calculation usually works as it should.

BM

BM

Donald A. Tevault
Donald A. Tevault
Joined: 17 Feb 06
Posts: 439
Credit: 73,516,529
RAC: 0

RE: Thanks. There might

Quote:

Thanks. There might (still) be something wrong with the progress accounting. However the calculation usually works as it should.

BM

Well, it seems to be doing better now. At 23 hours, 29 minutes, it's showing as 75.25% complete, with 12 hours 48 minutes to go.

Donald A. Tevault
Donald A. Tevault
Joined: 17 Feb 06
Posts: 439
Credit: 73,516,529
RAC: 0

RE: RE: Thanks. There

Quote:
Quote:

Thanks. There might (still) be something wrong with the progress accounting. However the calculation usually works as it should.

BM

Well, it seems to be doing better now. At 23 hours, 29 minutes, it's showing as 75.25% complete, with 12 hours 48 minutes to go.

I spoke too soon. It reset itself again, and is now showing at about 8% and 277 hours left to go.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.