got an inconclusive

Stranger7777
Stranger7777
Joined: 17 Mar 05
Posts: 436
Credit: 430140486
RAC: 74362

Agree. I didn't think of that

Agree. I didn't think of that until this moment.

David S
David S
Joined: 6 Dec 05
Posts: 2473
Credit: 22936222
RAC: 0

RE: I suppose it's nothing

Quote:

I suppose it's nothing to really worry about, but I don't get them very often on this project, and it has also had TWO hosts return validate errors.

http://einsteinathome.org/workunit/227613206


Back to the original topic, my _0 task has finally validated with the _3, and I got the canonical result.

David

Miserable old git
Patiently waiting for the asteroid with my name on it.

Shafa
Shafa
Joined: 31 May 05
Posts: 53
Credit: 627005014
RAC: 0

Coming back with the GTX

Coming back with the GTX 560Ti issue and invalid results.

Can confirm, that even after the BIOS upgrade (file provided by the card producer) work finishes mostly with invalid results.
http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=3707#bios

Conclusion is simple:
Gigabyte GTX560Ti GV-N560OC-1GI rev 1.0 (900MHz)
must be downclocked to approx 830MHz to provide consistently correct results.

The same issues are experienced with Palit Sonic GTX560Ti (900MHz).

No troubles with GTX 460, 570, 580, 760, 320, etc...

Christian Beer
Christian Beer
Joined: 9 Feb 05
Posts: 595
Credit: 188577641
RAC: 166590

Please also check the

Please also check the application version when you see invalids. Up until 1.02 we had a bug in checkpointing which leads to different result files if one of the hosts did resume from a checkpoint. So it must not be the host that has a problem. Application version 1.03 is working fine. We'll probably add some credit to those tasks because it was our error.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.