Floating point speed

Graham
Graham
Joined: 14 Nov 05
Posts: 6
Credit: 4,535
RAC: 0
Topic 190373

I appreciate the help from the CPU Heat topic, and as I watched the temp go upwards my fan kicked on and cooled it down, but anyways why is it that I have a higher floating point speed than a P4 2.4GHz, while I only run a single 1.6GHz chip?

Tern
Tern
Joined: 27 Jul 05
Posts: 309
Credit: 99,440,614
RAC: 15

Floating point speed

What are you comparing? Benchmark scores? What two machines? If benchmarks, what versions of BOINC? One optimized and one not? Both CPUs under your control where you can rerun tests?

Graham
Graham
Joined: 14 Nov 05
Posts: 6
Credit: 4,535
RAC: 0

Benchmark scores, one cpu,

Benchmark scores, one cpu, the latest download of BOINC.

Jord
Joined: 26 Jan 05
Posts: 2,952
Credit: 5,878,802
RAC: 5,551

Are you comparing an Intel P4

Are you comparing an Intel P4 with an AMD chip, perhaps?

Graham
Graham
Joined: 14 Nov 05
Posts: 6
Credit: 4,535
RAC: 0

Yes Intel to AMD...

Yes Intel to AMD...

Tern
Tern
Joined: 27 Jul 05
Posts: 309
Credit: 99,440,614
RAC: 15

RE: Benchmark scores, one

Message 21442 in response to message 21439

Quote:
Benchmark scores, one cpu, the latest download of BOINC.

Reread my questions. What are you comparing it TO? Give host ID#'s, something... can't answer "why" if we can't see the data...

Graham
Graham
Joined: 14 Nov 05
Posts: 6
Credit: 4,535
RAC: 0

Okay, bear with me, I just

Okay, bear with me, I just looked at your Athlon 3200, it has a Float speed of 2500+million ops a sec, mine is less than that, but when I look at other computers' benchmark scores I see lower numbers for Intel P4s running higher than 1.6GHz...Get me?

Mike Hewson
Mike Hewson
Moderator
Joined: 1 Dec 05
Posts: 6,579
Credit: 307,103,666
RAC: 156,565

RE: Okay, bear with me, I

Message 21444 in response to message 21443

Quote:
Okay, bear with me, I just looked at your Athlon 3200, it has a Float speed of 2500+million ops a sec, mine is less than that, but when I look at other computers' benchmark scores I see lower numbers for Intel P4s running higher than 1.6GHz...Get me?

If you're comparing to hyperthreading ( basically one processor behaving like two ) P4's then the benchmark will refer to each 'virtual' CPU - multiply by two to compare.

I have made this letter longer than usual because I lack the time to make it shorter ...

... and my other CPU is a Ryzen 5950X :-) Blaise Pascal

Michael Roycraft
Michael Roycraft
Joined: 10 Mar 05
Posts: 846
Credit: 157,718
RAC: 0

Keith, PREFACE: I'm not

Keith,

PREFACE: I'm not trying to start an Intel vs AMD war here, just offering a general explanation.

Different CPU architectures handle arithmetic operations differently. AMDs in general are more "efficient" (do more arithmetic per clock cycle) than Intels. Intels generally are able to clock faster than AMDs.

Intel procs are stronger at integer than at floatingpoint calcs, but by a factor of maybe 1.3/1. AMD procs also are able to process more integer than floatingpoint calcs, but the factor in favor of integer is more like 1.7/1.

microcraft
"The arc of history is long, but it bends toward justice" - MLK

Paul D. Buck
Paul D. Buck
Joined: 17 Jan 05
Posts: 754
Credit: 5,385,205
RAC: 0

Plus, the benchmark scores

Plus, the benchmark scores are essentially meaningless except for the mis-calculation of credit and the comparison of "mine is bigger" ... :)

tullio
tullio
Joined: 22 Jan 05
Posts: 2,118
Credit: 61,407,735
RAC: 0

RE: Keith, PREFACE: I'm

Message 21447 in response to message 21445

Quote:

Keith,

PREFACE: I'm not trying to start an Intel vs AMD war here, just offering a general explanation.

Different CPU architectures handle arithmetic operations differently. AMDs in general are more "efficient" (do more arithmetic per clock cycle) than Intels. Intels generally are able to clock faster than AMDs.

Intel procs are stronger at integer than at floatingpoint calcs, but by a factor of maybe 1.3/1. AMD procs also are able to process more integer than floatingpoint calcs, but the factor in favor of integer is more like 1.7/1.


Well, on my Pentium II at 400 MHz the integer/floating point ratio is 1.76.
Tullio

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.