FGRPB1G - No tasks to send

DF1DX
DF1DX
Joined: 14 Aug 10
Posts: 102
Credit: 2972275054
RAC: 1993200
Topic 209234

... and FGRPB1G work generator not running.

Intentional?

DF1DX
DF1DX
Joined: 14 Aug 10
Posts: 102
Credit: 2972275054
RAC: 1993200

Sorry - I thought I was

Sorry - I thought I was editing a single post, not creating duplicates. My bad.

Bernd Machenschalk
Bernd Machenschalk
Moderator
Administrator
Joined: 15 Oct 04
Posts: 4273
Credit: 245278509
RAC: 11794

There was some unexpected

There was some unexpected delay in pre-processing data for the FGRPB1G workunit generator. This has been fixed.

BM

DF1DX
DF1DX
Joined: 14 Aug 10
Posts: 102
Credit: 2972275054
RAC: 1993200

Many thanks for working

Many thanks for working overtime!

Martin Klueck
Martin Klueck
Joined: 14 Dec 11
Posts: 1
Credit: 7243447
RAC: 0

Hallo, since three days I

Hallo,

since three days I have no more new Jobs!? Why?

Gary Roberts
Gary Roberts
Moderator
Joined: 9 Feb 05
Posts: 5850
Credit: 110041310620
RAC: 22441385

Martin Klueck wrote:since

Martin Klueck wrote:
since three days I have no more new Jobs!? Why?

Hi Martin,

If you don't give any information, it's a lot harder to think through all the possible reasons.  I don't see any particular problem with the project issuing tasks, so the short answer is that it must be something to do with the way you have your machine configured.  Here are some things to consider.

  1. What particular searches have you selected to run?
  2. Have you previously been getting tasks for ALL selected searches?
  3. Have you made any preference settings changes recently?  If so, what?
  4. As you have been running FGRPB1 CPU tasks, are you aware of the upcoming transition to FGRP5 for CPU work?
  5. Have you previously been getting gravity wave (O1...) tasks?  Is that search still selected in your prefs?
  6. Have you perhaps run out of disk space BOINC is allowed to use?
  7. Have you checked the scheduler logs to see if any reasons are given there?

I provided a couple of links to information that might be relevant to your question.  I suggest you read them both carefully to see if they might solve your problem.

I decided to check the scheduler log for your machine's last contact with the server and it looks like you have too severe a restriction on disk space.  Here are some relevant lines from the log.  It looks like the scheduler wants to send you some GW work but you don't have enough disk space that BOINC is allowed to use.  In the excerpt below, I've trimmed the date, time and PID information so that the actual messages will be more readable (lines don't overflow).  I've added some highlighting to the important bits.

    [send] CPU: req 43560.00 sec, 2.00 instances; est delay 0.00
    [send] CUDA: req 0.00 sec, 0.00 instances; est delay 0.00
    [send] Intel GPU: req 0.00 sec, 0.00 instances; est delay 0.00
    [send] work_req_seconds: 43560.00 secs
    [send] available disk 0.09 GB, work_buf_min 0
    [send] active_frac 0.998437 on_frac 0.998212 DCF 0.841335
    [mixed] sending locality work first (0.4432)
    [send] send_old_work() no feasible result older than 336.0 hours
    [version] Checking plan class 'AVX'
    [version] reading plan classes file '/BOINC/projects/EinsteinAtHome/plan_class_spec.xml'
    [version] plan class ok
    [version] Best version of app einstein_O1Spot1Lo is 1.00 ID 986 AVX (7.52 GFLOPS)
    [send] send_old_work() no result younger than 263.3 hours and older than 168.0 hours
    [send] stopping work search - insufficient disk space

 As a first step, I suggest you go to your account page and select the 'preferences' menu item.  This will bring you to computing preferences.  If you are using different 'locations' (venues) make sure you have the right one selected.  You need to open the 'Advanced Settings' drop down link and look for Disk and Memory settings and tell us what you have the three disk related values set to.  These are the settings referred to in the link I provided earlier in this reply.

If you need help with adjusting these, please ask.

 If you have previously done a lot of GW work, the accumulation of large data files for that work might be the cause of your current lack of available space.  If you can't afford to allow BOINC to use more disk space, you can't just reclaim space by deleting what you might think are 'old and no longer needed files' since the scheduler will be likely to just send them all back to you.  In that case, you should just reset the project since you have no 'in progress' work at the moment and that will give you a fresh start with just the files you need for the future.

 

Cheers,
Gary.

solling2
solling2
Joined: 20 Nov 14
Posts: 219
Credit: 1564139881
RAC: 36826

Gary Roberts schrieb:Martin

Gary Roberts wrote:
Martin Klueck wrote:
since three days I have no more new Jobs!? Why?

  1. As you have been running FGRPB1 CPU tasks, are you aware of the upcoming transition to FGRP5 for CPU work?

 

 

I'd go with this explanation, not only because I've been unable to get FGRPB1-CPU tasks recently, but for the following two observations. First, a new app has been created on Aug 23, second, the number of tasks in progress dropped to less than half of average since then. Staff indicated recently that FGRPB1-CPU tasks are to be phased out. So it seems that a category of CPUs have been intentionally excluded from crunching FGRPB1-CPU tasks. Keep in mind that staff is out for LIGO/VIRGO/GEO600 meeting this weekend. Just make sure in the account-preferences-project settings to select the O1... boxes to run gravitational wave tasks on your machine.

FGRPB1G are a different thing, those will runs on your GPU if you follow Gary's advice.

Christian Beer
Christian Beer
Joined: 9 Feb 05
Posts: 595
Credit: 127814548
RAC: 331338

solling2 wrote: I'd go with

solling2 wrote:

I'd go with this explanation, not only because I've been unable to get FGRPB1-CPU tasks recently, but for the following two observations. First, a new app has been created on Aug 23, second, the number of tasks in progress dropped to less than half of average since then. Staff indicated recently that FGRPB1-CPU tasks are to be phased out. So it seems that a category of CPUs have been intentionally excluded from crunching FGRPB1-CPU tasks.

There shouldn't be any problems getting FGRPB1 CPU tasks. The new search is still in testing and shouldn't impact the other searches. We didn't exclude CPUs from the FGRPB1 search intentionally. If you don't get tasks please open a new thread and provide the hostids of computers where you think you should get FGRPB1 CPU work. The drop of in progress tasks has other reasons which are understood and do not point to a problem.

solling2
solling2
Joined: 20 Nov 14
Posts: 219
Credit: 1564139881
RAC: 36826

Christian Beer schrieb:There

Christian Beer wrote:
There shouldn't be any problems getting FGRPB1 CPU tasks. ... The drop of in progress tasks has other reasons which are understood and do not point to a problem.

Thanks for clarifying that. I'm sorry for my misinterpretation of what was apparently an unlucky coincidence. 

 

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.