E@H floating point speed.
21 Apr 2014 6:08:07 UTC
Topic 197548
(moderation:
Why is there a difference in floating point speed, between E@H stats and BAM stats.
http://einstein.phys.uwm.edu/server_status.php
http://boincstats.com/en/stats/5/project/detail
551.296 TeraFLOPS vs 1148.2 TFLOPS
E@H floating point speed.
)
See this old thread
So the BAM results are the
)
So the BAM results are the accurate ones? with the 'corrected' calculation method ?
I think only the project
)
I think only the project scientists can answer that question. But my gut feeling is that the people programming the E@H apps probably have a better clue of the actual amount of calculations required than a credit based statistics page do.