@288larsson : Which driver version you use? Crunching 2xWU@3500 sec. is not significant for GPU with 8.6 teraflops. Lets compare again: My Matrix 280X is crunching 2xWU@4500 sec.
@288larsson : Which driver version you use? Crunching 2xWU@3500 sec. is not significant for GPU with 8.6 teraflops. Lets compare again: My Matrix 280X is crunching 2xWU@4500 sec.
Thank you!
Does anyone know the typical run times of nvidia's latest and greatest ?
Actually only one invalid WU in your log, it should be OK to run two/three WUs at a time with good results. I'm a little puzzled by your CPU, it should have 4 cores, hasn't it?, and 8 threads if you enable hyperthreading. So it should also be possible to crunch three or four Einstein WUs if you don't crunch any CPU unit. Why does it show as a 2 core CPU?, some others of your hosts also show odd quantities of cores btw.
Thanks for your time.
hi I use cc_config.xml to set the number of CPU cores in BOINC.
@sale : I used the first who supported the fury x. I have update to 15.7 now
The problem is that (for me) Catalyst 14.4 processed 2XWU for 1:29 and Catalyst 15.7 processed 2XWU for 1:16. That's about the same difference as between 280x and Fury X. I think 500 seconds difference in treatment 1XWU and 1000 seconds with 2XWU simply not enough result because Fury X has twice the power.
Does anyone know the typical run times of nvidia's latest and greatest ?
The 980TI - titan X etc ?
Bill
(sorry if off topic )
I do not have the latest NVIDIA cards to test with but the runtime of Fury X appears to be similar to what I am seeing with my 780 Ti and the latest CUDA 5.5 application. A single task runs at 2000-2100 seconds with this configuration.
@288larsson : Which driver
)
@288larsson : Which driver version you use? Crunching 2xWU@3500 sec. is not significant for GPU with 8.6 teraflops. Lets compare again: My Matrix 280X is crunching 2xWU@4500 sec.
Thank you!
RE: @288larsson : Which
)
Does anyone know the typical run times of nvidia's latest and greatest ?
The 980TI - titan X etc ?
Bill
(sorry if off topic )
RE: Actually only one
)
hi I use cc_config.xml to set the number of CPU cores in BOINC.
@sale : I used the first who supported the fury x. I have update to 15.7 now
Here is my Fury X Ubuntu
)
Here is my Fury X Ubuntu box:
http://einsteinathome.org/host/11968754/tasks
Doing BRP6 in ~2500 secs .. for a single WU. I'm now going to switch to 2 WUs ..
Does anyone know how this compares to a R9 290x?
RE: Here is my Fury X
)
Not sure about 290X but on my MSI 280X the time for 3WUs is a bit less then two hours.
That gives us a time for 1 WU 7200/3= 2400 seconds
I think we should contact
)
I think we should contact moderators.
RE: I think we should
)
for what?
Fury X: On 2 WU .. It seems
)
Fury X: On 2 WU .. It seems to complete each in 3600.
So effectively 1,800 secs for each.
The problem is that (for me)
)
The problem is that (for me) Catalyst 14.4 processed 2XWU for 1:29 and Catalyst 15.7 processed 2XWU for 1:16. That's about the same difference as between 280x and Fury X. I think 500 seconds difference in treatment 1XWU and 1000 seconds with 2XWU simply not enough result because Fury X has twice the power.
RE: Does anyone know the
)
I do not have the latest NVIDIA cards to test with but the runtime of Fury X appears to be similar to what I am seeing with my 780 Ti and the latest CUDA 5.5 application. A single task runs at 2000-2100 seconds with this configuration.
Jeroen