All three results invalid?

zagadka
zagadka
Joined: 29 Apr 06
Posts: 12
Credit: 17,088
RAC: 0

As far as I can tell things

As far as I can tell things are working again.

I happened to get on the other side on this WU 8067314.

Martin P.
Martin P.
Joined: 17 Feb 05
Posts: 162
Credit: 40,156,217
RAC: 0

PROBLEM SEEMS TO BE


PROBLEM SEEMS TO BE FIXED!

Just sent up 4 WUs and all validated o.k.

Beyond
Beyond
Joined: 28 Feb 05
Posts: 117
Credit: 1,382,813,350
RAC: 5,732,892

Credit is being granted

Credit is being granted again. Not sure if problem is completely fixed. Also woder what going to happen to all the "lost" work?

Erik
Erik
Joined: 14 Feb 06
Posts: 2,815
Credit: 2,645,600
RAC: 0

RE: Just sent up 4 WUs and

Message 31458 in response to message 31456

Quote:
Just sent up 4 WUs and all validated o.k.

I've suspended my network activity until the validator is shown back online.

Dave Burbank
Dave Burbank
Joined: 30 Jan 06
Posts: 275
Credit: 1,548,376
RAC: 0

RE: I've suspended my

Message 31459 in response to message 31458

Quote:

I've suspended my network activity until the validator is shown back online.

It's only updated every 20 min so it could be fine now. But I with you, I lost a lot of work to this, better safe than sorry.

There are 10^11 stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers. - Richard Feynman

arashi
arashi
Joined: 12 Jun 05
Posts: 37
Credit: 41,761,784
RAC: 0

2:56 PM UTC on Thursday, 11

2:56 PM UTC on Thursday, 11 May 2006
Albert validator is now "running"
But we should still wait until someone "official" gives a statement.

Barrie
Barrie
Joined: 23 Mar 05
Posts: 219
Credit: 21,449,106
RAC: 0

RE: 2:56 PM UTC on

Message 31461 in response to message 31460

Quote:
2:56 PM UTC on Thursday, 11 May 2006
Albert validator is now "running"
But we should still wait until someone "official" gives a statement.

But don't hold your breath. Unless you are David Blaine, and then some.

Dead men don't get the baby washed. HTH

Jord
Joined: 26 Jan 05
Posts: 2,952
Credit: 5,779,100
RAC: 0

I may not be "official", but

I may not be "official", but I did get an answer from Bruce Allen:

Quote:

Thanks a lot for pointing this out. It appears that for about 8 hours our validator was marking all results as 'validate error'. I don't know why this happened: restarting the validator seems to have fixed this.

I'm going to write a script to grant credit to all the results which got marked as validate errors in this time interval.

Cheers,
Bruce

zagadka
zagadka
Joined: 29 Apr 06
Posts: 12
Credit: 17,088
RAC: 0

There is potential bad news

There is potential bad news for everybody:

The oldest reported result, I have found, that might have suffered from this was reported on 5 May 2006 at 15:01:21 UTC.

arturg
arturg
Joined: 29 Sep 05
Posts: 19
Credit: 47,396
RAC: 0

First good :) 8138960

First good :) 8138960

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.