ABP1 3.11 App for Windows available for Beta Test

Forums › Cruncher's Corner

Bernd Machenschalk
Bernd Machenschalk
Moderator
Administrator
Joined: 15 Oct 04
Posts: 4330
Credit: 251394672
RAC: 35874
6 Oct 2009 18:00:55 UTC
Topic 194565
(moderation:
    )

    A new Einstein@home ABP1 App for Windows is available for Beta Test at Beta Test Page.

    Looks like using the pre-release MinGW gcc-4.4 significantly sped up the (Windows) Application.

    This is a big package to download, as it contains the 3.11 ABP1 application as well as the current 3.05 S5R5.

    app_info.xml does contain entries for ABP1 3.07 thru 3.10 and S5R5 3.05, tasks assigned to older apps will error out.

    Please test and report.

    BM

    BM

    Gundolf Jahn
    Gundolf Jahn
    Joined: 1 Mar 05
    Posts: 1079
    Credit: 341280
    RAC: 0

    ABP1 3.11 App for Windows available for Beta Test

    6 Oct 2009 20:02:55 UTC
    Message 94955
    (moderation:
      )

      The installation path on the Beta Test Page for Windows (and probably the other OS too) is still not correct (pre BOINC 6.x). See also Message 98950.

      Gruß,
      Gundolf

      Computer sind nicht alles im Leben. (Kleiner Scherz)

      Bernd Machenschalk
      Bernd Machenschalk
      Moderator
      Administrator
      Joined: 15 Oct 04
      Posts: 4330
      Credit: 251394672
      RAC: 35874

      RE: The installation path

      6 Oct 2009 20:53:37 UTC
      Message 94956 in response to message 94955
      (moderation:
        )

        Quote:

        The installation path on the Beta Test Page for Windows (and probably the other OS too) is still not correct (pre BOINC 6.x). See also Message 98950.

        Gruß,
        Gundolf


        Thanks. Fixed.

        BM

        BM

        Richard Haselgrove
        Richard Haselgrove
        Joined: 10 Dec 05
        Posts: 2143
        Credit: 2975281220
        RAC: 788138

        Loaded and running. Is

        6 Oct 2009 21:48:47 UTC
        Message 94957
        (moderation:
          )

          Loaded and running.

          Is there any change on the (non-)SSE support - do you want me to try and fix the fan on the MMX?

          Richard Haselgrove
          Richard Haselgrove
          Joined: 10 Dec 05
          Posts: 2143
          Credit: 2975281220
          RAC: 788138

          RE: Thanks.

          6 Oct 2009 21:53:29 UTC
          Message 94958 in response to message 94956
          (moderation:
            )

            Quote:

            Thanks. Fixed.

            BM


            Well, up to a point. That's the Windows 2000/XP default. There are others, both pre- and post-2K/XP.

            See The Big BOINC 6 Answer Thread.

            Bernd Machenschalk
            Bernd Machenschalk
            Moderator
            Administrator
            Joined: 15 Oct 04
            Posts: 4330
            Credit: 251394672
            RAC: 35874

            RE: RE: Thanks.

            6 Oct 2009 22:40:40 UTC
            Message 94959 in response to message 94958
            (moderation:
              )

              Quote:
              Quote:

              Thanks. Fixed.

              BM


              Well, up to a point. That's the Windows 2000/XP default. There are others, both pre- and post-2K/XP.

              See The Big BOINC 6 Answer Thread.

              Ok, I added a link to there in the instructions.

              BM

              BM

              Oliver Behnke
              Oliver Behnke
              Moderator
              Administrator
              Joined: 4 Sep 07
              Posts: 987
              Credit: 25171438
              RAC: 3

              RE: Is there any change on

              6 Oct 2009 23:33:50 UTC
              Message 94960 in response to message 94957
              (moderation:
                )

                Quote:
                Is there any change on the (non-)SSE support - do you want me to try and fix the fan on the MMX?

                I don't think that's necessary as we didn't change things WRT SSE support. However, switching from GCC 3.4.5 to GCC 4.4 means quite a substantial change that might introduce unexpected problems... On the positive side of things: we found this version to increase performance by a factor of ~2 compared to 3.10 (current production version). As always, your mileage may vary.

                Cheers,
                Oliver

                Einstein@Home Project

                samuel7
                samuel7
                Joined: 16 Feb 05
                Posts: 34
                Credit: 1579363
                RAC: 0

                Host 1758399, Core2 Q9550, 4

                7 Oct 2009 17:44:46 UTC
                Message 94961
                (moderation:
                  )

                  Host 1758399, Core2 Q9550, 4 GiB, Vista64
                  v3.09 avg. CPU time 20.3k sec
                  v3.11 avg. CPU time 19.0k sec (4 tasks)
                  ==> 6.4 per cent improvement.
                  Example

                  Host 1101891, Core2 T7300, 2 GiB, Vista32
                  v3.09 avg. CPU time 26.3k sec
                  v3.11 first task projected CPU time @50%: 24.5k sec
                  ==> 6.8 per cent improvement.

                  One task started by v3.09 was completed (last 25%) by the new app on the laptop. It did validate.

                  BOINC v6.6.38 on both hosts. No overclocking. Graphics worked fine.

                  Bernd Machenschalk
                  Bernd Machenschalk
                  Moderator
                  Administrator
                  Joined: 15 Oct 04
                  Posts: 4330
                  Credit: 251394672
                  RAC: 35874

                  Thanks. My rough impression

                  7 Oct 2009 19:38:02 UTC
                  Message 94962
                  (moderation:
                    )

                    Thanks. My rough impression is that the speed gain is larger on AMD than on Intel, at least with the Core2 architecture.

                    BM

                    BM

                    Mark Henderson
                    Mark Henderson
                    Joined: 19 Feb 05
                    Posts: 34
                    Credit: 39043229
                    RAC: 1252

                    On my 9550 Quad Ver. 3.09

                    7 Oct 2009 20:15:26 UTC
                    Message 94963
                    (moderation:
                      )

                      On my 9550 Quad Ver. 3.09 averages 17500 seconds, Ver. 3.11 is a little faster at 16200 average.
                      Win. XP64

                      hotze33
                      hotze33
                      Joined: 10 Nov 04
                      Posts: 100
                      Credit: 368387400
                      RAC: 0

                      My E8400 needs 14500s for

                      8 Oct 2009 8:12:10 UTC
                      Message 94964
                      (moderation:
                        )

                        My E8400 needs 14500s for 3.09 and now 13500 for 3.11 on Win7 64bit.

                        Comment viewing options

                        Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

                        Forums › Cruncher's Corner