S5R1b behind

Bernd Machenschalk
Bernd Machenschalk
Moderator
Administrator
Joined: 15 Oct 04
Posts: 4267
Credit: 244931831
RAC: 16380
Topic 193569

Hi all!

People might remember the S5R1 run that started in 2006 and the problems we had with the fileserver hardware at the end of that year. Though the project experienced downtimes and slow progress, we didn't actually lose any valuable result files - or so we thought. Recently however it turned out that the (canonical) result files that dropped in on the server during three days at the end of 2006 are corrupted beyond repair or lost completely, probably related to a single crash of the fileserver.

In the near future (1-2 weeks) we'll begin to re-issue the workunits (~150,000) of the lost results with the label S5R3b. They should run with the Apps that we used at the end of S5R1.

As far as we can foresee this shouldn't affect the current run S5R3b at all, the workunits and tasks should just run side by side as it happened many times before during the transition from one run to the next.

BM

BM

Henk Haneveld
Henk Haneveld
Joined: 5 Feb 07
Posts: 18
Credit: 14114602
RAC: 337

S5R1b behind

Is this possible when running the windows 4.36 powerapp?

I think the use of the app_info.xml file will block other EXE files.

Donald A. Tevault
Donald A. Tevault
Joined: 17 Feb 06
Posts: 439
Credit: 73516529
RAC: 0

RE: Is this possible when

Message 80007 in response to message 80006

Quote:

Is this possible when running the windows 4.36 powerapp?

I think the use of the app_info.xml file will block other EXE files.

Yeah, this would probably apply to all of the power users apps.

Richard Haselgrove
Richard Haselgrove
Joined: 10 Dec 05
Posts: 2139
Credit: 2752956530
RAC: 1388829

RE: RE: Is this possible

Message 80008 in response to message 80007

Quote:
Quote:

Is this possible when running the windows 4.36 powerapp?

I think the use of the app_info.xml file will block other EXE files.


Yeah, this would probably apply to all of the power users apps.


And all Beta testers.

Klimax
Klimax
Joined: 27 Apr 07
Posts: 87
Credit: 1370205
RAC: 0

BTW:I noticed during

BTW:I noticed during yesterday's CVS update,that the result templates have been added.And I would say that S5R3c is avaiting...(Hopefully I can post this :-) )

(And hopefully I did not missed something... :-D )

hoarfrost
hoarfrost
Joined: 9 Feb 05
Posts: 207
Credit: 92487739
RAC: 110540

RE: In the near future (1-2

Quote:
In the near future (1-2 weeks) we'll begin to re-issue the workunits (~150,000) of the lost results with the label S5R3b. They should run with the Apps that we used at the end of S5R1.

Hello!

This results contain a really intresting data?

Bikeman (Heinz-Bernd Eggenstein)
Bikeman (Heinz-...
Moderator
Joined: 28 Aug 06
Posts: 3522
Credit: 686138814
RAC: 555564

RE: RE: In the near

Message 80011 in response to message 80010

Quote:
Quote:
In the near future (1-2 weeks) we'll begin to re-issue the workunits (~150,000) of the lost results with the label S5R3b. They should run with the Apps that we used at the end of S5R1.

Hello!

This results contain a really intresting data?

Those results were lost and never post-analyzed, so nobody knows.

CU
Bikeman

Astro
Astro
Joined: 18 Jan 05
Posts: 257
Credit: 1000560
RAC: 0

RE: [snip] so nobody

Message 80012 in response to message 80011

Quote:

[snip] so nobody knows.

CU
Bikeman

The "Shadow" knows!!!!!

jowr
jowr
Joined: 19 Feb 05
Posts: 55
Credit: 1947636
RAC: 0

Speaking of analysis, does

Speaking of analysis, does anyone know what's happening with the S4 data analysis?

Klimax
Klimax
Joined: 27 Apr 07
Posts: 87
Credit: 1370205
RAC: 0

RE: Speaking of analysis,

Message 80014 in response to message 80013

Quote:
Speaking of analysis, does anyone know what's happening with the S4 data analysis?


I'd say that it is still in proccess...

Bernd Machenschalk
Bernd Machenschalk
Moderator
Administrator
Joined: 15 Oct 04
Posts: 4267
Credit: 244931831
RAC: 16380

* Post-processing (or final

* Post-processing (or final analysis) of the E@H S4 run is finished, but the results are still under internal review.

* Unfortunately the lost S5R1 results span the whole frequency range, no current post-processing of the S5R1 results would work even in a limited frequency band until we have those results (again).

* Yep, there is a result template for S5R3c, but unless we find something going wrong in the current S5R3b I don't think it is of any other use than for internal tests. The next public run will most likely be named S5R4.

BM

BM

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.