What's the Hurry

eberndl
eberndl
Joined: 18 Jan 05
Posts: 43
Credit: 98691
RAC: 0

RE: I guess I don't see

Message 14823 in response to message 14822

Quote:
I guess I don't see what you mean by having to update manually on 4.72. I am currently running 4.72 on all 4 of my machines. They all upload the results when they are done, and then report them at a later time.

Yeah, I've always had the two step update happening, and I've always just accepted it and let it do it's thing... the only time I would be worried is if a project is being temperamental and a WU was almost due. But with my settings, that's never really a problem, so I am the ultimate set it and forget it girl.

Except that I recently changed my settings to finish off my CP unit so I can be rid of that frustrating project... But once it's gone it's once again back to my 50 predictor/50 everything else share...

j2satx
j2satx
Joined: 22 Jan 05
Posts: 46
Credit: 1650297
RAC: 0

Is the quorum decided when

Is the quorum decided when the WU is completed and validated or when it is "reported"?

Paul D. Buck
Paul D. Buck
Joined: 17 Jan 05
Posts: 754
Credit: 5385205
RAC: 0

After both. You have to

After both. You have to "report" it to get it into the database. THen it is validated, if valid and enough others are valid, then the quorum is formed. Unless I forgot a step ...

John McLeod VII
John McLeod VII
Moderator
Joined: 10 Nov 04
Posts: 547
Credit: 632255
RAC: 0

RE: Is the quorum decided

Message 14826 in response to message 14824

Quote:
Is the quorum decided when the WU is completed and validated or when it is "reported"?


The size of the quorum is decided upon by the project. Actually accepting a consensus of the quorum requires the validator to act. So, upload the science results, report to the scheduler which enters a mark in the database. If this is the one that will trigger the quorum the transitioner is triggered. The transitioner then informes the validator to do its work, and if the validator succeeds, credit is granted, but if the validator fails the results (they don't match) the WU is issued to someone else to attempt to make a consensus later. If there are too many errors, the WU errors out completely and nobody gets credit.

Jim Baize
Jim Baize
Joined: 22 Jan 05
Posts: 116
Credit: 582144
RAC: 0

The LHC result reported

Message 14827 in response to message 14822

The LHC result reported sometime during the night, but I didn't get the time that it happened. I unplugged my laptop to move it into the front room and the battery died before I had a chance to plug it back in. Could it be becuase the battery is 5 years old? LOL

Quote:
Still waiting on the LHC to report, but that could be a while. My current LHC WU still has an estimated 6 hours crunch time.


Jim

Walt Gribben
Walt Gribben
Joined: 20 Feb 05
Posts: 219
Credit: 1645393
RAC: 0

RE: The LHC result reported

Message 14828 in response to message 14827

Quote:

The LHC result reported sometime during the night, but I didn't get the time that it happened. I unplugged my laptop to move it into the front room and the battery died before I had a chance to plug it back in. Could it be becuase the battery is 5 years old? LOL

Quote:
Still waiting on the LHC to report, but that could be a while. My current LHC WU still has an estimated 6 hours crunch time.

Did you check the log file? See if the message is in stdoutdae.txt. That file is appended to, so old messages aren't lost each time BOINC starts.

Walt

j2satx
j2satx
Joined: 22 Jan 05
Posts: 46
Credit: 1650297
RAC: 0

RE: RE: Is the quorum

Message 14829 in response to message 14826

Quote:
Quote:
Is the quorum decided when the WU is completed and validated or when it is "reported"?

The size of the quorum is decided upon by the project. Actually accepting a consensus of the quorum requires the validator to act. So, upload the science results, report to the scheduler which enters a mark in the database. If this is the one that will trigger the quorum the transitioner is triggered. The transitioner then informes the validator to do its work, and if the validator succeeds, credit is granted, but if the validator fails the results (they don't match) the WU is issued to someone else to attempt to make a consensus later. If there are too many errors, the WU errors out completely and nobody gets credit.

What is the "usual" (no manual intervention) time lapse between the completed WU being initially submitted and the time it is "reported"?

Jordan Wilberding
Jordan Wilberding
Joined: 19 Feb 05
Posts: 162
Credit: 715454
RAC: 0

I think the answer is, "it

Message 14830 in response to message 14829

I think the answer is, "it depends". Usually it reports results the next time it communicates with the server I think.

Quote:

What is the "usual" (no manual intervention) time lapse between the completed WU being initially submitted and the time it is "reported"?


such things just should not be writ so please destroy this if you wish to live 'tis better in ignorance to dwell than to go screaming into the abyss worse than hell

John McLeod VII
John McLeod VII
Moderator
Joined: 10 Nov 04
Posts: 547
Credit: 632255
RAC: 0

RE: RE: RE: Is the

Message 14831 in response to message 14829

Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Is the quorum decided when the WU is completed and validated or when it is "reported"?

The size of the quorum is decided upon by the project. Actually accepting a consensus of the quorum requires the validator to act. So, upload the science results, report to the scheduler which enters a mark in the database. If this is the one that will trigger the quorum the transitioner is triggered. The transitioner then informes the validator to do its work, and if the validator succeeds, credit is granted, but if the validator fails the results (they don't match) the WU is issued to someone else to attempt to make a consensus later. If there are too many errors, the WU errors out completely and nobody gets credit.

What is the "usual" (no manual intervention) time lapse between the completed WU being initially submitted and the time it is "reported"?


It depends. It will be reported on the next contact to get work, when the time is later than 24 hours before the due date, when the user hits update, or if the version is recent enough (I am not certain this is in 4.45) when queue length of time has passed since the WU is completed.

j2satx
j2satx
Joined: 22 Jan 05
Posts: 46
Credit: 1650297
RAC: 0

RE: RE: What is the

Message 14832 in response to message 14831

Quote:
Quote:

What is the "usual" (no manual intervention) time lapse between the completed WU being initially submitted and the time it is "reported"?


It depends. It will be reported on the next contact to get work, when the time is later than 24 hours before the due date, when the user hits update, or if the version is recent enough (I am not certain this is in 4.45) when queue length of time has passed since the WU is completed.

4.72

Predictor

Connect 1.5

I want the "report" to go soonest, but want to know how long it will be if I do not "update".

Thanks.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.