S40.12 Observation thread

Steve Cressman
Steve Cressman
Joined: 9 Feb 05
Posts: 104
Credit: 139654
RAC: 0

S40.12 is workin great. Got

S40.12 is workin great. Got about 10% speedup over D40.
This system is running 15% overclock with no errors and none invalid.
xp2500+ @ 2.1GHz, 10.5 x 200 clock
:)

98SE XP2500+ @ 2.1 GHz Boinc v5.8.8

Joachim Schmidt
Joachim Schmidt
Joined: 19 Feb 05
Posts: 35
Credit: 391050
RAC: 0

Athlon 64 3000+ Short

Message 28365 in response to message 28364

Athlon 64 3000+

Short WUs:
D40: 1300 seconds
S40.12: 1130 seconds

Long WUs:
D40: 4400 seconds
S40.12: 4000 seconds

greets

AndyK
AndyK
Joined: 5 Jan 06
Posts: 21
Credit: 44767
RAC: 0

AMD 64 3000+ @2250MHz

AMD 64 3000+ @2250MHz (9x250), DDR @450MHz 2-3-3-5-1T

D40______S40.12
3493_____3024
3615_____3317
3511_____3083
3521_____3079
3554_____3099
=============
3538,8__3120,4

~ 12% Speed gain

AndyK

Want to know your pending credit?

[img]http://tinyurl.com/438v3"[/img]
The biggest bug is sitting 10 inch in front of the screen.

RandyC
RandyC
Joined: 18 Jan 05
Posts: 6678
Credit: 111139797
RAC: 0

After running S40.12 for a

After running S40.12 for a couple of days now on my XP2600+ system, it seems to have become very unstable (crashes and/or reboots itself). I am going back to D40 on it.

I do a lot of video processing on this system, so there may be some kind of conflict with that.

My XP1600+ system seems to run very stable with S40.12, so I will leave it alone.

Seti Classic Final Total: 11446 WU.

Steve Cressman
Steve Cressman
Joined: 9 Feb 05
Posts: 104
Credit: 139654
RAC: 0

Result duration correction

Result duration correction factor 0.133796 :o
Just flyin' along with the afterburners on full burn :)

98SE XP2500+ @ 2.1 GHz Boinc v5.8.8

DanNeely
DanNeely
Joined: 4 Sep 05
Posts: 1364
Credit: 3562358667
RAC: 0

RE: Result duration

Message 28369 in response to message 28368

Quote:
Result duration correction factor 0.133796 :o
Just flyin' along with the afterburners on full burn :)

Was that supposed to be .23...? .13 would imply an 8x speedup.

MarkF
MarkF
Joined: 12 Apr 05
Posts: 393
Credit: 1516715
RAC: 0

Switched over from the

Switched over from the standard science app to S40.12 a couple of days ago. WOW! My daily output has almost tripled. Akosf for King!

Steve Cressman
Steve Cressman
Joined: 9 Feb 05
Posts: 104
Credit: 139654
RAC: 0

RE: RE: Result duration

Message 28371 in response to message 28369

Quote:
Quote:
Result duration correction factor 0.133796 :o
Just flyin' along with the afterburners on full burn :)

Was that supposed to be .23...? .13 would imply an 8x speedup.


That was copied and pasted from my computer summary page after doing a bunch of short units. Usually it is around .21 when doing long units.
:)

98SE XP2500+ @ 2.1 GHz Boinc v5.8.8

DanNeely
DanNeely
Joined: 4 Sep 05
Posts: 1364
Credit: 3562358667
RAC: 0

That's interesting, the short

That's interesting, the short WUs see less of a gain on my machine than the long ones.

Andreas
Andreas
Joined: 19 Oct 05
Posts: 754
Credit: 41467440
RAC: 15147

Richard Haselgrove and

Richard Haselgrove and DanNeely, it's good to see you have found out about Team BOINC Synergy and registered at our site, but you also have to go through the following steps:

Your account>find team>select BOINC Synergy>join team We're pleased to have you with us!

Click my stat image to go to the BOINC Synergy Team site!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.