I just tried running s38 on my Athlon Classic. WUs errored out in a second or two with computation errors. I reverted to the old version I was running on it. Not sure which it was, dated 3/2/06.
I just tried running s38 on my Athlon Classic. WUs errored out in a second or two with computation errors. I reverted to the old version I was running on it. Not sure which it was, dated 3/2/06.
Athlon T-Birds do not support SSE, witch is necessary to run S38.
On Durons there seems to be problems too, but all Athlon XP should do the job.
So far my S-38/C-37 reports are based on a single "pure" S-38 result per CPU.
By "Dist" I mean performance on the unmodified Albert 4.37 science application as distributed by the project.
Here is an update, all four CPUs have at least one pure S-38 result completed.
[pre]CPU S-38/C-37 C-37/Dist S-38/Dist
P4 EE HT 0.862 0.516 0.445
Pentium M (Banias) 0.616 0.448 0.276
Pentium III 0.677 0.383 0.259
Pentium II 0.673 0.385 0.259[/pre]
While someone has suggested an AMD vs. Intel speedup difference, I think it may be a better fit to the data to say that older chips with (relatively) poorer floating point are speeding up by bigger percentages than the relatively more floating point capable ones.
Perhaps akosf managed to econimize even more on the overhead of the central routine than on the actual numeric content.
RE: I prefer polinomials
)
Maybe You should collect money for a X2 with 2 · 1MB Cachè. ;-))
My Results so far, without any validation problems:
Athlon XP 2400+@2230MHz: -24,7%
Athlon X2 4400+@2616MHz: -25.5%
I changed from S38a to S39.
Excellent work!
I wish I could help to port it to Linux, but my last ASM-Coding was about 20 years ago. ;)
A64x2 at 2.4gig 1:35-1:05
)
A64x2 at 2.4gig
1:35-1:05 on big WUs 31% gain.
28-20m on small ones. 28% gain.
about 60% of my new WUs are still pending but no validation errors yet.
I just tried running s38 on
)
I just tried running s38 on my Athlon Classic. WUs errored out in a second or two with computation errors. I reverted to the old version I was running on it. Not sure which it was, dated 3/2/06.
RE: I just tried running
)
Athlon T-Birds do not support SSE, witch is necessary to run S38.
On Durons there seems to be problems too, but all Athlon XP should do the job.
My Athlon T-Bird is successfully runnig C37.
Just a short question: For
)
Just a short question:
For the replacement of the client no app_info.xml is needed here, as opposed to Seti?
Aloha, Uli
correct. Just drop the new
)
correct. Just drop the new executable into place.
Thanks a lot! Will do it
)
Thanks a lot! Will do it right now :D
Aloha, Uli
RE: So far my S-38/C-37
)
Here is an update, all four CPUs have at least one pure S-38 result completed.
[pre]CPU S-38/C-37 C-37/Dist S-38/Dist
P4 EE HT 0.862 0.516 0.445
Pentium M (Banias) 0.616 0.448 0.276
Pentium III 0.677 0.383 0.259
Pentium II 0.673 0.385 0.259[/pre]
While someone has suggested an AMD vs. Intel speedup difference, I think it may be a better fit to the data to say that older chips with (relatively) poorer floating point are speeding up by bigger percentages than the relatively more floating point capable ones.
Perhaps akosf managed to econimize even more on the overhead of the central routine than on the actual numeric content.
S38 took 2200 seconds off of
)
S38 took 2200 seconds off of C37 on my 3.4 Prescott (HT enabled). Definately a winner!
me-[at]-rescam.org
Can only concour with all the
)
Can only concour with all the above posts, amazing results on my first pc running S38 compared to C37.
WOW FANTASTIC