Thanks. The CPU block will come from Swiftech. :)
The most important element of the liquid cooling system.
Glad to have helped. Swiftech makes great watercooling parts, that block should help you battle the summer heat or a nice overclock.
Well...sorry Akos but I gotta ask... is this one of your "super hosts"?
Thanks. The CPU block will come from Swiftech. :)
The most important element of the liquid cooling system.
Glad to have helped. Swiftech makes great watercooling parts, that block should help you battle the summer heat or a nice overclock.
Well...sorry Akos but I gotta ask... is this one of your "super hosts"?
No. This is only my laptop.
Thanks.
Hmmmm... I still can't figure out how that host can be crunching results so quickly.
There are 10^11 stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers. - Richard Feynman
"Bootleg" sounds a bit like "illegal". See the entry dated 2006/05/17 on the E@H news page on Akos's contribution to the project. http://einstein.phys.uwm.edu/news.php.
Hmmmm... I still can't figure out how that host can be crunching results so quickly.
That is not so quick, but I did some Core2 optimization.
Ahhhhhh... I must have misread one of your earlier posts, I was under the impression that laptop was not one of your hosts.
Is the optimization you've done Core2 specific, or is it broader, and will work on SSE2 or SSE3 CPUs?
When you say 'that is not so quick' do you mean there is more room for improvement?
Thanks, and nice job!
There are 10^11 stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers. - Richard Feynman
When you say 'that is not so quick' do you mean there is more room for improvement?
Of course.
Why am I not surprised ;-)
There are 10^11 stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers. - Richard Feynman
RE: RE: Thanks. The CPU
)
No. This is only my laptop.
RE: RE: RE: Thanks. The
)
Thanks.
Hmmmm... I still can't figure out how that host can be crunching results so quickly.
There are 10^11 stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers. - Richard Feynman
RE: Hmmmm... I still can't
)
That is not so quick, but I did some Core2 optimization.
RE: RE: Hmmmm... I still
)
So..
A) You've got even faster optimizations than this in your test code.
...and...
b) This guy is running a bootleg application?
RE: b) This guy is
)
"Bootleg" sounds a bit like "illegal". See the entry dated 2006/05/17 on the E@H news page on Akos's contribution to the project. http://einstein.phys.uwm.edu/news.php.
CU
BRM
RE: b) This guy is
)
Psst... "This guy" is Akos. He has admitted that the machine in question is his own laptop... ;-)
RE: RE: Hmmmm... I still
)
Ahhhhhh... I must have misread one of your earlier posts, I was under the impression that laptop was not one of your hosts.
Is the optimization you've done Core2 specific, or is it broader, and will work on SSE2 or SSE3 CPUs?
When you say 'that is not so quick' do you mean there is more room for improvement?
Thanks, and nice job!
There are 10^11 stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers. - Richard Feynman
RE: Is the optimization
)
It runs on all SSE2 CPU, but much faster on Core2.
Of course.
RE: RE: When you say
)
Why am I not surprised ;-)
There are 10^11 stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers. - Richard Feynman
RE: RE: b) This guy is
)
OK, I read the "it's not so quick" comment as meaning "my version is better" which implied to me that the machine in question wasn't one of his.