GPU Price Performance Curve

Abhijit Borah
Abhijit Borah
Joined: 1 Jan 06
Posts: 6
Credit: 141,876,826
RAC: 100,789

I really do not know how to

I really do not know how to create an app_info.xml for running 2 WU on a single capable card. I wonder if I can use any app_info.xml too, and also in which folder to store it. I need help, lots of them.

FrankHagen
FrankHagen
Joined: 13 Feb 08
Posts: 102
Credit: 272,200
RAC: 0

RE: I really do not know

Quote:
I really do not know how to create an app_info.xml for running 2 WU on a single capable card. I wonder if I can use any app_info.xml too, and also in which folder to store it. I need help, lots of them.

check your pm's...

Bikeman (Heinz-Bernd Eggenstein)
Bikeman (Heinz-...
Moderator
Joined: 28 Aug 06
Posts: 3,522
Credit: 694,324,725
RAC: 144,736

RE: Here you go Bikeman - A

Quote:

Here you go Bikeman - A GPU Value Plot

[...]


I wonder how the new low-end Kepler cards would fit in here, especially the retail GT 640. I understand that there are completely different cards sold under the GT 640 label: those based on the Fermi chip, and newer ones using Kepler chips. If you are not sure which is which: if core and shader clock are the same ==> Kepler, otherwise it's a Fermi.

I think they are sold for under 100€, consume only around 65 W and still should be able to crunch a BRP4 unit in little more than 2100 sec or so if you run two in parallel. Can someone confirm this? This would make an excellent price/performance ratio.

Any experience with this card?

CU
HBE

Jeroen
Jeroen
Joined: 25 Nov 05
Posts: 379
Credit: 740,030,628
RAC: 0

RE: I wonder how the new

Quote:


I wonder how the new low-end Kepler cards would fit in here, especially the retail GT 640. I understand that there are completely different cards sold under the GT 640 label: those based on the Fermi chip, and newer ones using Kepler chips. If you are not sure which is which: if core and shader clock are the same ==> Kepler, otherwise it's a Fermi.

I think they are sold for under 100€, consume only around 65 W and stil should be able to crunch a BRP4 unit in little more than 2100 sec or so if you run two in parallel. Can someone confirm this? This would make an excellent price/performance ratio.

Any experience with this card?

CU
HBE

I would also be interested to know how the GT 640 handles with this project. In particular, I like this card that EVGA has designed:

http://www.evga.com/products/moreInfo.asp?pn=02G-P4-2643-KR

I like the small form factor and the high flow bracket on the back.The card has two SMX units (384 cores) and PCI-E 3.0 support which should be beneficial for the project here.

The main thing that I do not like at this stage is that the newer Linux NVIDIA drivers (> 295.33) which support this card have PCI-E 3.0 disabled with no way that I could find to enable the link speed at 8 GT/s. I sent in a support ticket with NVIDIA for this issue and I am hoping that they will have some kind of solution for this. NVIDIA did release a patch program for Windows to set the link speed at 8 GT/s.

Jeroen

hotze33
hotze33
Joined: 10 Nov 04
Posts: 100
Credit: 368,387,400
RAC: 0

Over at anandtech this card

Over at anandtech this card was tested and the result is: good as htpc but horrible at gaming.
This card has DDR3 and starving for bandwidth.
In folding it is below a GTS450.

Bikeman (Heinz-Bernd Eggenstein)
Bikeman (Heinz-...
Moderator
Joined: 28 Aug 06
Posts: 3,522
Credit: 694,324,725
RAC: 144,736

RE: Over at anandtech this

Quote:
Over at anandtech this card was tested and the result is: good as htpc but horrible at gaming.
This card has DDR3 and starving for bandwidth.
In folding it is below a GTS450.

Thanks for the link!
That's kind of disappointing, but still, to be sure, I'd like to see performance figures over here at E@H. It's obvious that a 65 W card can't do wonders in terms of performance But I would have hoped that it outperforms my GTS 450 on BRP4 tasks.

Cheers
HBE

tolafoph
tolafoph
Joined: 14 Sep 07
Posts: 122
Credit: 74,659,937
RAC: 0

the specs for the GT640 look

the specs for the GT640 look similar to my old GTX260.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Nvidia_graphics_processing_units#GeForce_200_Series
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GeForce_600_Series

When I´m runnig it with 2 tasks it will take around 2h to finish both. CPU @ 3.2GHz + only PCI-E 1.0. Maybe thats the problem. But the powerconsumption is way worse than with the newer cards.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.