GNU/Linux S5R3 "power users" App 4.27 available

Melvyn Bobo Slacke
Melvyn Bobo Slacke
Joined: 22 Jan 05
Posts: 32
Credit: 1,692,164
RAC: 0

I see a lot of

I see a lot of windows_intelx86 in the app_info.xml, OK?
It seems to run fine anyway with fresh units.

Opened the graphics just for fun and it wasn't pretty, but I don't care.

Desti
Desti
Joined: 20 Aug 05
Posts: 117
Credit: 23,762,214
RAC: 10

I have upgraded one machine

I have upgraded one machine from 4.21 and I got this:

2008-01-21 18:25:09 [Einstein@Home] Sending scheduler request: To fetch work
2008-01-21 18:25:09 [Einstein@Home] Requesting 123032 seconds of new work
2008-01-21 18:25:14 [Einstein@Home] Scheduler RPC succeeded [server version 601]
2008-01-21 18:25:14 [Einstein@Home] Message from server: Resent lost result h1_0712.85_S5R2__56_S5R3a_1
2008-01-21 18:25:14 [Einstein@Home] Message from server: Resent lost result h1_0826.80_S5R2__415_S5R3a_1
2008-01-21 18:25:14 [Einstein@Home] Message from server: Resent lost result h1_0712.85_S5R2__98_S5R3a_2
2008-01-21 18:25:14 [Einstein@Home] Message from server: Resent lost result h1_0712.90_S5R2__4_S5R3a_1
2008-01-21 18:25:14 [Einstein@Home] [error] No app version for result: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu -1
2008-01-21 18:25:14 [Einstein@Home] [error] No app version for result: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu -1
2008-01-21 18:25:14 [Einstein@Home] [error] No app version for result: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu -1
2008-01-21 18:25:14 [Einstein@Home] [error] No app version for result: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu -1
2008-01-21 18:25:14 [Einstein@Home] Deferring communication for 1 min 0 sec
2008-01-21 18:25:14 [Einstein@Home] Reason: requested by project
2008-01-21 18:25:16 [Einstein@Home] [file_xfer] Started download of file h1_0712.85_S5R2
2008-01-21 18:25:16 [Einstein@Home] [file_xfer] Started download of file l1_0712.85_S5R2

RAMA
RAMA
Joined: 5 May 05
Posts: 18
Credit: 657,880,205
RAC: 0

RE: I have upgraded one

Message 77401 in response to message 77400

Quote:

I have upgraded one machine from 4.24 and I got this:

2008-01-21 18:25:09 [Einstein@Home] Sending scheduler request: To fetch work
2008-01-21 18:25:09 [Einstein@Home] Requesting 123032 seconds of new work
2008-01-21 18:25:14 [Einstein@Home] Scheduler RPC succeeded [server version 601]
2008-01-21 18:25:14 [Einstein@Home] Message from server: Resent lost result h1_0712.85_S5R2__56_S5R3a_1
2008-01-21 18:25:14 [Einstein@Home] Message from server: Resent lost result h1_0826.80_S5R2__415_S5R3a_1
2008-01-21 18:25:14 [Einstein@Home] Message from server: Resent lost result h1_0712.85_S5R2__98_S5R3a_2
2008-01-21 18:25:14 [Einstein@Home] Message from server: Resent lost result h1_0712.90_S5R2__4_S5R3a_1
2008-01-21 18:25:14 [Einstein@Home] [error] No app version for result: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu -1
2008-01-21 18:25:14 [Einstein@Home] [error] No app version for result: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu -1
2008-01-21 18:25:14 [Einstein@Home] [error] No app version for result: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu -1
2008-01-21 18:25:14 [Einstein@Home] [error] No app version for result: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu -1
2008-01-21 18:25:14 [Einstein@Home] Deferring communication for 1 min 0 sec
2008-01-21 18:25:14 [Einstein@Home] Reason: requested by project
2008-01-21 18:25:16 [Einstein@Home] [file_xfer] Started download of file h1_0712.85_S5R2
2008-01-21 18:25:16 [Einstein@Home] [file_xfer] Started download of file l1_0712.85_S5R2


I am getting the same thing, really strange is that it says S5R2 - "R-TWO" apps which should be history for a long time by now ?

Sorry, missed the end of the file name, but anyway, got the same message, but only with one of 4 Linux computers that I switched.

Brian Silvers
Brian Silvers
Joined: 26 Aug 05
Posts: 772
Credit: 282,700
RAC: 0

RE: I am getting the same

Message 77402 in response to message 77401

Quote:

I am getting the same thing, really strange is that it says S5R2 - "R-TWO" apps which should be history for a long time by now ?

S5R3 uses the same datasets as from S5R2. You can tell the difference between a "real live" S5R2 task vs. a S5R3 task by the fact it has S5R3a in the task name... If you were doing an actual S5R2 task, there would be no mention of S5R3.

th3
th3
Joined: 24 Aug 06
Posts: 208
Credit: 2,208,434
RAC: 0

Looks like you guys got some

Looks like you guys got some 64bit compatibility problems there. And once again im reminded of why i uses 32bit linux on my 64bit capable computers. =)

2 results with 4.27 is almost finished, looks a tad slower than 4.21 on my Core 2 Xeon3060, but the WUs im comparing then are from slightly different data files. I will have to revert to 4.21 and fill up the work cache with WUs from same data file, then crunch some of them with 4.21 and then change to 4.27, that should give a definitive answer to which one performs best on Core 2.

M. Schmitt
M. Schmitt
Joined: 27 Jun 05
Posts: 478
Credit: 15,872,262
RAC: 0

No problem with upgrade

No problem with upgrade here:

01-21 17:02:22 [---] Starting BOINC client version 5.10.21 for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
[...]
2008-2008-01-21 17:02:22 [Einstein@Home] Found app_info.xml; using anonymous platform
[...]
2008-01-21 17:02:22 [Einstein@Home] Restarting task h1_0762.95_S5R2__242_S5R3a_1 using einstein_S5R3 version 421
2008-01-21 17:02:23 [Einstein@Home] Restarting task h1_0762.95_S5R2__239_S5R3a_0 using einstein_S5R3 version 421

But that windows stuff in the app_info.xml is funny. :)

cu,
Michael

Bernd Machenschalk
Bernd Machenschalk
Moderator
Administrator
Joined: 15 Oct 04
Posts: 3,915
Credit: 193,354,862
RAC: 24,157

RE: But that windows stuff

Message 77405 in response to message 77404

Quote:
But that windows stuff in the app_info.xml is funny.


Sorry, the app_info.xml was derived from the Windows one. Maybe I should delete the tag altogether. All people having trouble on 64 bit: give it a try. Remove the line manually.

BM

BM

Astro
Astro
Joined: 18 Jan 05
Posts: 257
Credit: 1,000,560
RAC: 0

Can someone look at the work

Can someone look at the work done on my 6000 using linux and see if 4.27 appears to be faster? The top wu was started with 4.24 and finished with 4.27. The rest were 4.24.

If it appears to be faster, than I can't wait for one "solely" run by 4.27.

[edit]just noticed the C/H (claimed credit/hour) is right up there with optimized seti now(or nearly so). OH yeah, G/H is granted/hour

Svenie25
Svenie25
Joined: 21 Mar 05
Posts: 139
Credit: 2,436,862
RAC: 0

RE: RE: But that windows

Message 77407 in response to message 77405

Quote:
Quote:
But that windows stuff in the app_info.xml is funny.

Sorry, the app_info.xml was derived from the Windows one. Maybe I should delete the tag altogether. All people having trouble on 64 bit: give it a try. Remove the line manually.

BM

Justed tested it on Vista 64bit. The errormessage is away. Thanks a lot.

Astro
Astro
Joined: 18 Jan 05
Posts: 257
Credit: 1,000,560
RAC: 0

RE: RE: But that windows

Message 77408 in response to message 77405

Quote:
Quote:
But that windows stuff in the app_info.xml is funny.

Sorry, the app_info.xml was derived from the Windows one. Maybe I should delete the tag altogether. All people having trouble on 64 bit: give it a try. Remove the line manually.

BM


I was getting the same message, so I deleted all 4 "platform" lines, and now I'm getting work again, and BM labels it as 4.27 to boot.

64b Mandriva w/5.10.21X86-64 boinc

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.