Detector Watch 3

Brian O'Reilly
Brian O'Reilly
Joined: 25 Mar 05
Posts: 3
Credit: 12985
RAC: 0

RE: When watching the

Message 50962 in response to message 50944

Quote:

When watching the detectors, it helps to know what such things as DARM, AS, PO, WFS, REF, and GDS mean, with respect to the detection of gravitational waves.

You are right we should update the acronyms. For people who don't want to wade
through the PDF you point to here is a short explanation of terms:

DARM: (D)ifferential Arm, since the gravitational wave signal manifests as a difference in the length of the two arms we use this acronym a lot. The "DARM
loop" is the control loop that is designed to keep the interferometer operating
at the null point i.e. when both arms are the same length. So you'll see a lot
of reference to channels like

DARM_ERR: The error point of the loop. This is where any GW signal should
appear.

DARM_CTRL: The control signal for the loop

AS: Anti-Symmetric, this is the dark port of the interferometer and is read out
on ISCT4 (Interferometer Sensing Control Table 4). This acronym shows up a lot
in the log, for example the acquisition photo-diode is called AS5 or ASPD5.
When we operate we use ASPDn where n=1,2,3,4. You'll also see people talk
about AS_Q and AS_I. AS_Q is one phase of the AS port light which is closely
related to DARM_ERR and is also sensitive to changes in the differential arm length. AS_I is the orthogonal phase (i.e. rotated 90 degrees) and is sensitive to changes in the common length of the arms (i.e. Lx+Ly changes). One thing that
causes such changes is angular wiggling of the mirrors.

PO: Pick-Off, most of our optics have a wedged shape, this allows us to pick-off a small fraction of the light from the angled surface and use the information in the electric field of this light to control the interferometer. This shows up
in the log usually as POX (pick-off from Input Test Mass X (or ITMX)), POY (pick-off from ITMY) and POB (pick-off from the Beam-Splitter (BS)).

WFS: Wave Front Sensing, the WFS system is composed of a set of photodiodes
that are designed to sense the shape of the propogating wavefront of the light at various ports. This information is then fed back to the mirrors using the
ASC (Angular Sensing and Control) system, which as the name implies is designed to keep the mirrors from rotating about a vertical (yaw) or horizontal (pitch) axis.

REF: I think this should be REFL, which designates the REFLected port of the
interferometer also called the symmetric port. Since the dark-port is where
you have destructive interference, the bright port or symmetric port is where
you get constructive interference from the michelson.

GDS: Global Diagnostic Systems, this is the name given to a set of tools we
use to make measurements of the various channels. An important tool in this
system is DTT (Diagnostic Test Tools). This is what we use to make many of
the amplitude spectra, time-series etc.

Hope this helps. I'm impressed that people read our logs so carefully.

Brian

Mike Hewson
Mike Hewson
Moderator
Joined: 1 Dec 05
Posts: 6591
Credit: 320641009
RAC: 432251

RE: When watching the

Message 50963 in response to message 50962

Quote:
When watching the detectors......................
Hope this helps......


It certainly does! That's terrific information, and thank you Brian! :-)

I always wondered about the WFS, that now makes sense... whereas Michelson and Morley quite deliberately, slightly misaligned their beams so that they could get a phase variation ( fringes ) over the image plane that they stared at. Poor chaps didn't have photodiodes and wouldn't have otherwise had much hope in getting any sensitivity to their "DARM". But then they only needed to detect a shift in the fringe pattern ( or lack of it ) upon rotating by 90 degrees the table it was on. Whereas with LIGO misalignment means degraded confidence in GW detection?

Cheers, Mike.

I have made this letter longer than usual because I lack the time to make it shorter ...

... and my other CPU is a Ryzen 5950X :-) Blaise Pascal

Brian O'Reilly
Brian O'Reilly
Joined: 25 Mar 05
Posts: 3
Credit: 12985
RAC: 0

Misalignment causes a lot of

Message 50964 in response to message 50963

Misalignment causes a lot of problems. The power build-up in the arms is reduced
if the alignment is bad, so we get less photons measuring the arm length and
therefore worse sensitivity. Another problem is that the amount of junk light
at the photodiode goes way up i.e. the light not in the Q phase. This can lead
to saturations in the photodiode head, the RF electronics or the ADC (analogue to digital converter). Once something saturates that loop that uses that signal as a control signal can become unstable and out of lock we go. In one of our
early science runs (S2 I think), the loudest event that survived one of our
searches actually came from a saturation. We've gotten a little smarter since
then, but it can still happen so we watch out for it.

Quote:
Quote:
When watching the detectors......................
Hope this helps......

It certainly does! That's terrific information, and thank you Brian! :-)

I always wondered about the WFS, that now makes sense... whereas Michelson and Morley quite deliberately, slightly misaligned their beams so that they could get a phase variation ( fringes ) over the image plane that they stared at. Poor chaps didn't have photodiodes and wouldn't have otherwise had much hope in getting any sensitivity to their "DARM". But then they only needed to detect a shift in the fringe pattern ( or lack of it ) upon rotating by 90 degrees the table it was on. Whereas with LIGO misalignment means degraded confidence in GW detection?

Cheers, Mike.


Mike Hewson
Mike Hewson
Moderator
Joined: 1 Dec 05
Posts: 6591
Credit: 320641009
RAC: 432251

RE: Another problem is that

Message 50965 in response to message 50964

Quote:
Another problem is that the amount of junk light
at the photodiode goes way up i.e. the light not in the Q phase.


The Q-phase would be light in ( Fabry-Perot type ) resonance that still has a useful phase relationship for our purposes?

Cheers, Mike.

I have made this letter longer than usual because I lack the time to make it shorter ...

... and my other CPU is a Ryzen 5950X :-) Blaise Pascal

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.