Canceled "bad" BRP beams

AgentB
AgentB
Joined: 17 Mar 12
Posts: 915
Credit: 513,211,304
RAC: 0

Christian Beer wrote:I

Christian Beer wrote:
I canceled the beams:

Thanks Christian.

Is cancelling the same as sending out the abort signal recently sent to the O1MD1 tasks?

Christian Beer
Christian Beer
Joined: 9 Feb 05
Posts: 595
Credit: 126,442,076
RAC: 338,937

AgentB wrote:Christian Beer

AgentB wrote:
Christian Beer wrote:
I canceled the beams:

Thanks Christian.

Is cancelling the same as sending out the abort signal recently sent to the O1MD1 tasks?

No it is not, but I'm investigating how to extend the hardcoded abort signal I had to use for O1MD1 to other tasks without a DB lookup.

AgentB
AgentB
Joined: 17 Mar 12
Posts: 915
Credit: 513,211,304
RAC: 0

p2030.20141117.G190.73+00.40.

p2030.20141117.G190.73+00.40.N.b2s0g0.00000 may have some suspect WUs.

See https://einsteinathome.org/workunit/265296841 and https://einsteinathome.org/workunit/265296724

Christian Beer
Christian Beer
Joined: 9 Feb 05
Posts: 595
Credit: 126,442,076
RAC: 338,937

I canceled the following

I canceled the following beams:

p2030.20141117.G190.73+00.40.N.b0s0g0.00000
p2030.20141117.G190.73+00.40.N.b1s0g0.00000
p2030.20141117.G190.73+00.40.N.b2s0g0.00000
p2030.20141117.G190.73+00.40.N.b3s0g0.00000
p2030.20141117.G190.73+00.40.N.b4s0g0.00000
p2030.20160210.G201.54+00.94.N.b5s0g0.00000
p2030.20141117.G190.73+00.40.N.b5s0g0.00000
p2030.20160203.G181.98-02.02.N.b5s0g0.00000
p2030.20160212.G178.67-00.91.S.b6s0g0.00000

Christian Beer
Christian Beer
Joined: 9 Feb 05
Posts: 595
Credit: 126,442,076
RAC: 338,937

I canceled the following

I canceled the following beams:

p2030.20160213.G199.92-01.17.C.b6s0g0.00000
p2030.20160213.G200.65+00.22.C.b6s0g0.00000

Juha
Juha
Joined: 27 Nov 14
Posts: 49
Credit: 4,962,746
RAC: 21

p2030.20161228.G202.16-01.29.

p2030.20161228.G202.16-01.29.C.b1s0g0.00000 looks bad.

I've got total four tasks from it, two are already validate errors and two more are going to be, except I'll just abort them. Judging from wingmen the whole beam seems bad.

Ubik
Ubik
Joined: 30 Oct 09
Posts: 9
Credit: 5,462,771
RAC: 2,443

Here is another candidate for

Here is another candidate for cancellation:

p2030.20170122.G199.80-01.40.S.b4s0g0.00000

Plenty of validate errors for everyone who gets such a task.

jb
jb
Joined: 27 Oct 10
Posts: 4
Credit: 1,982,121
RAC: 0

1) Has anyone kept an

1) Has anyone kept an historical histogram of data-stream validation?  It might be interesting, encouraging, or constructive to make it visible, especially to invalidation victims. 

2) I seem to remember a Ghantt chart of SETI tasks, and enjoyed watching the flow of science as each effort built on the last.  Is that still around?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.