Umm... did you notice that most of your P4 partners are running hyperthreaded? I did not click enough times to find the 3.2 rig, but saw a 2.8 rig which when you divided the reported CPU time by two to account give credit for the work done on the other thread appeared to give a productivity better than yours, with a productivity per Hz slightly below yours (though that is a meaningless number).
I did`nt notice the hyperthreading. The 3.2 rig is the last 2 on my results page sent 3rd july, also hyperthreading. My apoligies.
It would be nice to know what Intel’s latest dual can do. If any one has got one could they post here so that we can look on in envy! dAVE
First time posting-hope I get it right.
I just got a new computer with an a-bit mobo (IL8) with an intel 3.4 pentium D
and my avg work went to 833. This is a real hummer. I also have a WINFAST 7900 PX video card. If you use 3DMARK2001 tests it tops out at 32000 score.I can do 20,000 WU's per month. I like it very much-very costly tho.
RE: RE: [Umm... did you
)
I did`nt notice the hyperthreading. The 3.2 rig is the last 2 on my results page sent 3rd july, also hyperthreading. My apoligies.
It would be nice to know what
)
It would be nice to know what Intel’s latest dual can do. If any one has got one could they post here so that we can look on in envy! dAVE
RE: It would be nice to
)
Check last few posts in this thread http://einsteinathome.org/node/191137
RE: It would be nice to
)
First time posting-hope I get it right.
I just got a new computer with an a-bit mobo (IL8) with an intel 3.4 pentium D
and my avg work went to 833. This is a real hummer. I also have a WINFAST 7900 PX video card. If you use 3DMARK2001 tests it tops out at 32000 score.I can do 20,000 WU's per month. I like it very much-very costly tho.