00109404: 8B 4C DE 80 83 EB 10 75 F3 89 EA 90 ->
00109404: 0F 18 44 DE 80 83 EB 10 75 F2 89 EA SETI_K78b
Ok, it seems I returned too late to download this update so I applied patch by hands. Patched version finished current WU successfully but all others finished with error immediately. So this version is not for Athlon XP.
Quote:
Well, I modified, but I'm not interested in SETI.
Very sad news for SETI crunchers :( Your SETI_K78 outperforms both Crunch3r's SSE2&3 versions on all Athlon 64/ Pentium 4 I have to install it.
It's amazing, thank you very much!
Maybe you would consider possibility of creation 3DNow! optimized client for SETI too? Your D-40 for Einstein is great....
Thank you again.
Hi. Where can i download optimized client for s@h - > seti_K78b.zip, because the previous link is not operational.
Ok, it seems I returned too late to download this update so I applied patch by hands. Patched version finished current WU successfully but all others finished with error immediately. So this version is not for Athlon XP.
It was a fast modified code to my Duron.
But I tried out on my Durons and on one of my laptops (Dothan core) some days ago.
It worked fine.
Quote:
Quote:
Well, I modified, but I'm not interested in SETI.
Very sad news for SETI crunchers :( Your SETI_K78 outperforms both Crunch3r's SSE2&3 versions on all Athlon 64/ Pentium 4 I have to install it.
It's amazing, thank you very much!
Maybe you would consider possibility of creation 3DNow! optimized client for SETI too? Your D-40 for Einstein is great....
Thank you again.
Well... I think you don't know that I'm a big SETI fanatic.
Probably, I was the only guy who used an optimised SETI classic client. :-)
And, I tried to build a FPGA (Xilinx Spartan-3 ~ 10USD) based SETI accelerator card about a year ago, but the speed of the PCI bus wasn't enough to my algorithm. I was in trouble because I didn't have the source code so I couldn't select better functions to reduce the needed bandwidth.
Einstein. The test of S-40 is running. It has better prefetch.
It was a fast modified code to my Duron.
But I tried out on my Durons and on one of my laptops (Dothan core) some days ago.
It worked fine.
Hm, strange. I tried on Athlon Thoroughbred 2400+. Will repeat on Barton...
Quote:
Well... I think you don't know that I'm a big SETI fanatic.
Probably, I was the only guy who used an optimised SETI classic client. :-)
And, I tried to build a FPGA (Xilinx Spartan-3 ~ 10USD) based SETI accelerator card about a year ago, but the speed of the PCI bus wasn't enough to my algorithm. I was in trouble because I didn't have the source code so I couldn't select better functions to reduce the needed bandwidth.
Wow :) It sounds wonderful. So I will not worry about SETI optimization future now :)
Quote:
Einstein. The test of S-40 is running. It has better prefetch.
Hope it will be public available very soon to try it :)
PS Barton met the same situation. Current WU was finished fine, but all other ended with error after 2 sec of computing.
***UNHANDLED EXCEPTION****
Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x00509400 read attempt to address 0x01F0FF80
I tried both K78 and K78b on my barton with no success. But the good news is that with the latest opp app, D-40, I am now doing work 3.7x faster than with the standerd app. Went from 260 min/result to 70 min/result. D-40 knocked off another 5 min :)
Hi. Where can i download optimized client for s@h - > seti_K78b.zip, because the previous link is not operational.
akosf,
maybe you have overlooked this question...?
it would be very kind if you post another link
These files are removed, because some people found an illagel address problem. I said that this executable was written to myself, but it worked fine (on my computers). It did about 1500-2000 wus to me (Duron,AthlonXP,Northwood,Dothan) a little bit faster than other clients. I'm sure that some prefetch routines aren't perfect, but it wasn't problem to me. (I used Win2000 and BOINC 4.19/4.45.) Probably I will do a revision on this code.
These files are removed, because some people found an illagel address problem. I said that this executable was written to myself, but it worked fine (on my computers). It did about 1500-2000 wus to me (Duron,AthlonXP,Northwood,Dothan) a little bit faster than other clients. I'm sure that some prefetch routines aren't perfect, but it wasn't problem to me. (I used Win2000 and BOINC 4.19/4.45.) Probably I will do a revision on this code.
Please, restore link for original seti_K78 with remark that it's work on Athlon 64/P4 SSE2/3 and may not work on SSE-only processors. This version works faster on P4/A64 than Crunch3r's SSE2/3 so it will be surely useful on these procs.
Please, restore link for original seti_K78 with remark that it's work on Athlon 64/P4 SSE2/3 and may not work on SSE-only processors. This version works faster on P4/A64 than Crunch3r's SSE2/3 so it will be surely useful on these procs.
The link is live again. (SETI K7-08)
But I don't do any funny remarks and I don't promise anything.
Is okay?
Please, restore link for original seti_K78 with remark that it's work on Athlon 64/P4 SSE2/3 and may not work on SSE-only processors. This version works faster on P4/A64 than Crunch3r's SSE2/3 so it will be surely useful on these procs.
The link is live again. (SETI K7-08)
But I don't do any funny remarks and I don't promise anything.
Is okay?
I did a few WUs with that app. They finished OK but took 7-10 min longer.
I have processed 12 wu's in the past few hours on my Dual Xeon 3.0Ghz 2mb. I am getting an average time of 21 min, my old average was 28 min using Cruncher's SSE3 app. I have a lot of 19 min results but sometimes they finish in 25 mins.
RE: RE: 00109404: 8B 4C
)
Hi. Where can i download optimized client for s@h - > seti_K78b.zip, because the previous link is not operational.
RE: Ok, it seems I returned
)
It was a fast modified code to my Duron.
But I tried out on my Durons and on one of my laptops (Dothan core) some days ago.
It worked fine.
Well... I think you don't know that I'm a big SETI fanatic.
Probably, I was the only guy who used an optimised SETI classic client. :-)
And, I tried to build a FPGA (Xilinx Spartan-3 ~ 10USD) based SETI accelerator card about a year ago, but the speed of the PCI bus wasn't enough to my algorithm. I was in trouble because I didn't have the source code so I couldn't select better functions to reduce the needed bandwidth.
Einstein. The test of S-40 is running. It has better prefetch.
RE: It was a fast modified
)
Hm, strange. I tried on Athlon Thoroughbred 2400+. Will repeat on Barton...
Wow :) It sounds wonderful. So I will not worry about SETI optimization future now :)
Hope it will be public available very soon to try it :)
PS Barton met the same situation. Current WU was finished fine, but all other ended with error after 2 sec of computing.
***UNHANDLED EXCEPTION****
Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x00509400 read attempt to address 0x01F0FF80
I tried both K78 and K78b on
)
I tried both K78 and K78b on my barton with no success. But the good news is that with the latest opp app, D-40, I am now doing work 3.7x faster than with the standerd app. Went from 260 min/result to 70 min/result. D-40 knocked off another 5 min :)
98SE XP2500+ @ 2.1 GHz Boinc v5.8.8
RE: Hi. Where can i
)
akosf,
maybe you have overlooked this question...?
it would be very kind if you post another link
RE: RE: Hi. Where can i
)
These files are removed, because some people found an illagel address problem. I said that this executable was written to myself, but it worked fine (on my computers). It did about 1500-2000 wus to me (Duron,AthlonXP,Northwood,Dothan) a little bit faster than other clients. I'm sure that some prefetch routines aren't perfect, but it wasn't problem to me. (I used Win2000 and BOINC 4.19/4.45.) Probably I will do a revision on this code.
RE: These files are
)
Please, restore link for original seti_K78 with remark that it's work on Athlon 64/P4 SSE2/3 and may not work on SSE-only processors. This version works faster on P4/A64 than Crunch3r's SSE2/3 so it will be surely useful on these procs.
RE: Please, restore link
)
The link is live again. (SETI K7-08)
But I don't do any funny remarks and I don't promise anything.
Is okay?
RE: RE: Please, restore
)
I did a few WUs with that app. They finished OK but took 7-10 min longer.
me-[at]-rescam.org
Thanks akosf for relinking
)
Thanks akosf for relinking SETI K708.
I have processed 12 wu's in the past few hours on my Dual Xeon 3.0Ghz 2mb. I am getting an average time of 21 min, my old average was 28 min using Cruncher's SSE3 app. I have a lot of 19 min results but sometimes they finish in 25 mins.
Overclock with the MSI G31M3-L and Intel E8600 3.33Ghz
Intel D865GLC Socket 478 Motherboard Review
Overclock your ASUS 1005HA netbook and crunch more