Report Web site Problems Here

Oliver Behnke
Oliver Behnke
Moderator
Administrator
Joined: 4 Sep 07
Posts: 984
Credit: 25171376
RAC: 35

Thanks Juha, looking into it.

Thanks Juha, looking into it. It should be public.

Einstein@Home Project

Harri Liljeroos
Harri Liljeroos
Joined: 10 Dec 05
Posts: 4340
Credit: 3203793121
RAC: 1956099

When viewing some of the

When viewing some of the threads in these forums, the https is missing the identity information from the web site. At least Firefox shows sometimes the lock symbol in yellow and sometimes in green. This seems to be random which thread acts like this and which don't. All of them show https://einsteinathome.org/... in the address.

AgentB
AgentB
Joined: 17 Mar 12
Posts: 915
Credit: 513211304
RAC: 0

Harri Liljeroos wrote:When

Harri Liljeroos wrote:
When viewing some of the threads in these forums, the https is missing the identity information from the web site. At least Firefox shows sometimes the lock symbol in yellow and sometimes in green. This seems to be random which thread acts like this and which don't. All of them show https://einsteinathome.org/... in the address.

  This is correct, because other contributors include non https content (typically images) in their posting.  See Richard's posting below for such an image.

 

Harri Liljeroos
Harri Liljeroos
Joined: 10 Dec 05
Posts: 4340
Credit: 3203793121
RAC: 1956099

AgentB wrote:Harri Liljeroos

AgentB wrote:
Harri Liljeroos wrote:
When viewing some of the threads in these forums, the https is missing the identity information from the web site. At least Firefox shows sometimes the lock symbol in yellow and sometimes in green. This seems to be random which thread acts like this and which don't. All of them show https://einsteinathome.org/... in the address.

  This is correct, because other contributors include non https content (typically images) in their posting.  See Richard's posting below for such an image.

 

OK. I didn't remember that the pictures are not on this web site but are actually on external sites.

puh32
puh32
Joined: 5 Dec 15
Posts: 12
Credit: 1023111601
RAC: 4359

All right, this is probably

All right, this is probably not a "web site problem" but more like a "web site question".

I can't seem to find a count of the total number of different workunits I have completed for E@H. Sure, I see some under "Tasks", but they go away after some time.

How many FGRPB1 workunits have I completed? for instance. I'm curious to find out. Is there such a page somewhere?

Holmis
Joined: 4 Jan 05
Posts: 1118
Credit: 1055935564
RAC: 0

No there is no total count of

No there is no total count of the tasks a user has completed, you get credit awarded instead. Tasks and workunits are deleted from the online database after all tasks for the workunit are completed/errored/timed out to keep the database smaller and faster.

AgentB
AgentB
Joined: 17 Mar 12
Posts: 915
Credit: 513211304
RAC: 0

puh32 wrote:How many FGRPB1

puh32 wrote:
How many FGRPB1 workunits have I completed? for instance. I'm curious to find out. Is there such a page somewhere?

Each host keeps a job_log file, which you can copy and then analyse. Note these are completed (not validated tasks).

This is located in the boinc data directory, for e@h the filename is job_log_einstein.phys.uwm.edu.txt

Juha
Juha
Joined: 27 Nov 14
Posts: 49
Credit: 4964434
RAC: 0

Without permission to comment

Without permission to comment a post there's a "Post new comment" section at the bottom of the page just as normal just without the comment box. I guess the section should be hidden like in locked posts.

Although I would like it better if there was a text stating the reason why I can't comment (or post). Like "commenting closed" or "log in to comment". My first reaction to the locked news posts was that there was a bug somewhere because there was no (other) indication that the posts were locked.

Shawn Kwang
Shawn Kwang
Joined: 3 Nov 15
Posts: 289
Credit: 3058301
RAC: 1569

Juha_6 wrote:Without

Juha_6 wrote:

Without permission to comment a post there's a "Post new comment" section at the bottom of the page just as normal just without the comment box. I guess the section should be hidden like in locked posts.

Although I would like it better if there was a text stating the reason why I can't comment (or post). Like "commenting closed" or "log in to comment". My first reaction to the locked news posts was that there was a bug somewhere because there was no (other) indication that the posts were locked.

Part of the new code that we intend to implement should remove the whole box from the bottom of the page, which will minimize this confusion. In addition, the links to create new posts and comments should be removed as well (where appropriate). We were hoping to have it implemented today buy it hot pushed back to Monday due to  other issues that appeared elsewhere. I'm sorry this leaves you (the users) in this funny state.

Einstein@Home Project

Richard Haselgrove
Richard Haselgrove
Joined: 10 Dec 05
Posts: 2143
Credit: 2955889826
RAC: 719097

Shawn Kwang wrote:Juha_6

Shawn Kwang wrote:
Juha_6 wrote:

Without permission to comment a post there's a "Post new comment" section at the bottom of the page just as normal just without the comment box. I guess the section should be hidden like in locked posts.

Although I would like it better if there was a text stating the reason why I can't comment (or post). Like "commenting closed" or "log in to comment". My first reaction to the locked news posts was that there was a bug somewhere because there was no (other) indication that the posts were locked.

Part of the new code that we intend to implement should remove the whole box from the bottom of the page, which will minimize this confusion. In addition, the links to create new posts and comments should be removed as well (where appropriate). We were hoping to have it implemented today buy it hot pushed back to Monday due to  other issues that appeared elsewhere. I'm sorry this leaves you (the users) in this funny state.

Quoting a previous poster seems (new in the last few days) to append a 'random' number to the end of the previous user's name. [I suspect it may be the message number in the thread - edit: suspicion withdrawn]: but since the messages aren't (visibly) numbered, that's not much help.

OK, so it didn't happen this time. Maybe only the top-level quote gets the treatment?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.