Regarding 1.57, I've downloaded dozens without noticing download trouble. I promoted one each on two systems to run before their turn. Both have reported and are awaiting quorum partner returns.
Magic hopefully you will be able to get some which finish and validate.
My Stederr said this, which means nothing to me.
Quote:
7.0.28
- exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005)
Well as always I figured I better take a look before midnight and see what happened and both v1.57 tasks finished in about 2hrs 47mins but I had to do an update so they could be sent in and are now *pending* but Boinc decided I could get new tasks again so I picked up 20 new ones so the 660Ti is back to work and about 15 minutes faster X2
I got some of these for my 560Ti but it has quite a few of the other 2 versions to do before it gets to these v1.57 tasks.
Same goes for the two 550Ti's and the 650Ti and the 610M for the laptop
But so far it looks like they will crunching those in the next couple days too.
Oh and Betreger as far as that bit of your stderr goes it just basically says you are using a older version of Boinc and that version 7.0.28 is from 29 June 2012
I have still the same error as mentioned a couple of weeks ago with the old app version. Parkes app makes my grapfics card crash without any error message and the restarts at last checkpoint. See url to the thread.
1.56 is actually more than 10% slower on my laptop compared to 1.52
Your machine reports using a GeForce 610M, which apparently uses a GF119 chip--part of the Fermi generation.
We've not seen a report of a Fermi chip getting appreciable benefit from the Einstein Parkes CUDA32 to CUDA55 upgrade. A full 10% loss would be worse than reported, but not reliably measured by a single sample, I think.
Kepler and Maxwell chips, on the other hand, are consistently getting major improvement. Happily there are a lot of Kepler and an increasing number of Maxwell cards in the community.
My GTX 470 is running, but not under ideal conditions for timing. Recent work allocation has meant two PMPS running together, whereas previous timings were one Einstein with one SETI. I think I saw an improvement, but only a small one.
Regarding 1.57, I've
)
Regarding 1.57, I've downloaded dozens without noticing download trouble. I promoted one each on two systems to run before their turn. Both have reported and are awaiting quorum partner returns.
one 1.57 task
second 1.57 task
RE: Magic hopefully you
)
I have still the same error
)
I have still the same error as mentioned a couple of weeks ago with the old app version. Parkes app makes my grapfics card crash without any error message and the restarts at last checkpoint. See url to the thread.
http://einsteinathome.org/node/198063
RE: 1.56 is
)
1.56 is actually more than 10% slower on my laptop compared to 1.52 :(
edit: I completed only one 1.56 however.
RE: 1.56 is actually more
)
Your machine reports using a GeForce 610M, which apparently uses a GF119 chip--part of the Fermi generation.
We've not seen a report of a Fermi chip getting appreciable benefit from the Einstein Parkes CUDA32 to CUDA55 upgrade. A full 10% loss would be worse than reported, but not reliably measured by a single sample, I think.
Kepler and Maxwell chips, on the other hand, are consistently getting major improvement. Happily there are a lot of Kepler and an increasing number of Maxwell cards in the community.
My GTX 470 is running, but
)
My GTX 470 is running, but not under ideal conditions for timing. Recent work allocation has meant two PMPS running together, whereas previous timings were one Einstein with one SETI. I think I saw an improvement, but only a small one.
still crashing
)
still crashing here.
http://einstein.phys.uwm.edu/
)
http://einsteinathome.org/host/11959785/tasks
9 finished with no problems and faster on the 660Ti
2 finished with no problem on the 550Ti (a few seconds slower)
http://einsteinathome.org/host/4063825/tasks
RE: 9 finished with no
)
660 Ti GK104 Kepler
550 Ti GF116 Fermi
So continues to fit the Kepler or Maxwell quite good, Fermi about break even, pre-Fermi probably not helped simplistic summary.
RE: RE: 9 finished with
)
Yes it looks that way so far and I still have to wait for my 650Ti to get through the v1.52's before I get to the v1.57's to see how they do.
I have two of the 550Ti's and another 650Ti in my stash so I may replace one of the 550Ti's