Is there any optimized einstein app APPROVED for S5 workunits

debugas
debugas
Joined: 11 Nov 04
Posts: 170
Credit: 77,331
RAC: 0
Topic 191488

i've noticed talks in forums that some optimizations for S5 have been thrown away as faulty. do we have any stable optimization now that the original einstein science group approved as stable and OKed to use ?

For me science is primary and competition is secondary but i still want to do more science in less time with less energy used by my PCs

So if there are approved optimizations which one could i use for my Celeron 1.7Ghz ?

ErichZann
ErichZann
Joined: 11 Feb 05
Posts: 120
Credit: 81,582
RAC: 0

Is there any optimized einstein app APPROVED for S5 workunits

Quote:

i've noticed talks in forums that some optimizations for S5 have been thrown away as faulty. do we have any stable optimization now that the original einstein science group approved as stable and OKed to use ?

For me science is primary and competition is secondary but i still want to do more science in less time with less energy used by my PCs

So if there are approved optimizations which one could i use for my Celeron 1.7Ghz ?

not at the moment, no....
We all hope it will happen soon, because the 0712 test versions for example are very stable and fast and NORMALY there is no reason, not to use them but..... yeah... hm... we are not allowed :/

Matt3223
Matt3223
Joined: 22 Jan 05
Posts: 54
Credit: 448,298
RAC: 0

the current S5R1 official app

the current S5R1 official app is optimized a good bit.........so technically we're using an optimezed app by akos and the rest........but no, there are not currently any other secondary apps to use at the moment.

the app is faster than the old albert one, but the units take longer because they are alot bigger.....we're doing more science faster/work unit.

Crystallize
Crystallize
Joined: 20 Feb 05
Posts: 12
Credit: 67,987
RAC: 0

Well, I don't care what you

Well, I don't care what you say, I'm using the patched app
and have not had any problems with faulty WUs at all, not even one !

But the credit is still down 28-30% even with this version, but
I suppose it's better than the 50% less than the official version

also I don't care if you say that the official version is optimized in it self.
With a 50% drop in RAC it just can't be optimized ... enough...

[B@H] Ray
[B@H] Ray
Joined: 4 Jun 05
Posts: 621
Credit: 49,583
RAC: 0

RE: Well, I don't care what

Message 41042 in response to message 41041

Quote:

Well, I don't care what you say, I'm using the patched app
and have not had any problems with faulty WUs at all, not even one !

But the credit is still down 28-30% even with this version, but
I suppose it's better than the 50% less than the official version

also I don't care if you say that the official version is optimized in it self.
With a 50% drop in RAC it just can't be optimized ... enough...

Crystallize
When the scientist only want the output from the offical app. for now you are just spinning your wheels with the patched app.


Try the Pizza@Home project, good crunching.

Pooh Bear 27
Pooh Bear 27
Joined: 20 Mar 05
Posts: 1,376
Credit: 20,312,671
RAC: 0

You also run the risk of them

You also run the risk of them zeroing out all your credits, because they believe the science is not good enough. So you want to run a chance to lose all those credits?

Athlonheizer
Athlonheizer
Joined: 3 Jun 06
Posts: 33
Credit: 513,937
RAC: 0

Other question, why the WUs

Other question, why the WUs must actually be so large?
Does it give a conclusive reason there??
I do not like such large WUs!

Athlon

Stay tuned and keep crunching

Steve Cressman
Steve Cressman
Joined: 9 Feb 05
Posts: 104
Credit: 139,654
RAC: 0

RE: Well, I don't care what

Message 41045 in response to message 41041

Quote:

Well, I don't care what you say, I'm using the patched app
and have not had any problems with faulty WUs at all, not even one !

But the credit is still down 28-30% even with this version, but
I suppose it's better than the 50% less than the official version

also I don't care if you say that the official version is optimized in it self.
With a 50% drop in RAC it just can't be optimized ... enough...


Your parents sure failed to raise you properly. Once again you show how despicable you really are.

98SE XP2500+ @ 2.1 GHz Boinc v5.8.8

Dave Burbank
Dave Burbank
Joined: 30 Jan 06
Posts: 275
Credit: 1,548,376
RAC: 0

RE: Well, I don't care what

Message 41046 in response to message 41042

Quote:

Well, I don't care what you say, I'm using the patched app
and have not had any problems with faulty WUs at all, not even one !

But the credit is still down 28-30% even with this version, but
I suppose it's better than the 50% less than the official version

also I don't care if you say that the official version is optimized in it self.
With a 50% drop in RAC it just can't be optimized ... enough...

Hey while you're at it, go fill your car up with that really high octane gas, you know that stuff that only high-end sports cars can use efficiently and costs way too much. Done...? Good, now put that gas-guzzler up on jacks, find a nice brick to put on top of your gas pedal, turn on the engine and walk away. Don't forget to fill as needed.

Oh yeah, every scientist you ever meet deserves a punch in the head because they obviously have no clue what they're talking about.

P.S. Try replacing the brick with your foot so you can see just how pointless what you're doing really is. And don't forget to brag about how fast you got your car running on those stilts.

There are 10^11 stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers. - Richard Feynman

Misfit
Misfit
Joined: 11 Feb 05
Posts: 470
Credit: 100,000
RAC: 0

RE: Well, I don't care what

Message 41047 in response to message 41041

Quote:
Well, I don't care what you say, I'm using the patched app
and have not had any problems with faulty WUs at all, not even one !


Your app may work perfectly however it's not authorized/recognized by the science team. Hence your workunits will be discarded and resent out. So while you may be building your credit faster you are slowing down the science.

me-[at]-rescam.org

Barrie
Barrie
Joined: 23 Mar 05
Posts: 219
Credit: 21,449,106
RAC: 0

RE: Well, I don't care what

Message 41048 in response to message 41041

Quote:
Well, I don't care what you say, I'm using the patched app
and have not had any problems with faulty WUs at all, not even one !

You can do what you like with your machine, but not with someone else's database. As a matter of common decency, you should not submit results that are not acceptable to the project team. If you don't like it, go and help another project for a while, and come back when the official app has been optimised further.

Dead men don't get the baby washed. HTH

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.