Note how I cut off about 3000 seconds just by overclocking it to 200 extra Mhz. Well, it's not "just," more like 10% on my Athlon XP-2600 (which strangely reports as Athlon XP-2400). My goal is to get sub-20,000 second numbers on this old setup, as I'm too cheap (think college student level of poorness ;)) to get a 64-bit system like some of you. Maybe I should build another XP 2600+ system. ;)
19 Mar 2005 3:04:10 UTC 20 Mar 2005 8:16:26 UTC Over Success Done 22,187.50 89.13 78.62
18 Mar 2005 20:51:58 UTC 19 Mar 2005 22:17:23 UTC Over Success Done 22,085.27 88.72 77.90
18 Mar 2005 5:06:59 UTC 19 Mar 2005 3:04:10 UTC Over Success Done 21,608.12 86.80 74.57
17 Mar 2005 20:38:24 UTC 18 Mar 2005 20:51:58 UTC Over Success Done 22,549.13 90.59 pending
17 Mar 2005 2:41:53 UTC 18 Mar 2005 5:06:52 UTC Over Success Done 23,785.30 95.55 86.68
16 Mar 2005 0:58:32 UTC 17 Mar 2005 20:38:24 UTC Over Success Done 25,509.21 91.44 79.10
15 Mar 2005 4:11:02 UTC 17 Mar 2005 2:41:53 UTC Over Success Done 25,201.47 90.33 103.40
14 Mar 2005 6:26:06 UTC 16 Mar 2005 0:58:32 UTC Over Success Done 25,554.57 91.60 94.68
Ok I have several WU's that were done last night and some interesting insights.
FX53 13x203=2639Mhz
2207550 81562 21 Mar 2005 1:32:50 UTC 21 Mar 2005 10:58:16 UTC Over Success Done ...16,869.13... 70.56 pending
2187045 572354 20 Mar 2005 20:50:56 UTC 21 Mar 2005 6:15:30 UTC Over Success Done ..16,876.17... 70.59 pending
2186978 572338 20 Mar 2005 10:29:02 UTC 20 Mar 2005 23:16:56 UTC Over Success Done ...16,975.91... 71.00 pending
What I can conclude from this is MIPS is everything.
The FX53 with dual on die memory controllers and 1 mb of l2 cache has really no effect on WU performance and with that front side bus doesn't either.
Interesting enough the benchmark for the client is flawed
AAdjuster's
Benchmark results:
Number of CPUs: 1
2561 double MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
6991 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
Finished CPU benchmarks
The AAdjuster's Dhrystone benchmarks are out of wack.
The FX53's benchmarks at 2639 MHz
Measured floating point speed 2530.23 million ops/sec
Measured integer speed 4697.29 million ops/sec
These results are clearly at odds with each other.
Another interesting thing is that AAduster's credits are inflated even though the time is nearly the identical..
My claimed credts all range in the 72 area where all of his/hers are in the 90's
very strange indeed.
> Interesting enough the benchmark for the client is flawed
>
> AAdjuster's
> Benchmark results:
> Number of CPUs: 1
> 2561 double MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
> 6991 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
> Finished CPU benchmarks
>
> The AAdjuster's Dhrystone benchmarks are out of wack.
>
> The FX53's benchmarks at 2639 MHz
> Measured floating point speed 2530.23 million ops/sec
> Measured integer speed 4697.29 million ops/sec
>
> These results are clearly at odds with each other.
> Another interesting thing is that AAduster's credits are inflated even though
> the time is nearly the identical..
> My claimed credts all range in the 72 area where all of his/hers are in the
> 90's
> very strange indeed.
>
I'd guess you're using 4.25 and he's using 4.19
Dominique
[edit]
Using 4.25 I get around 65. With 4.19 I used to get around 85.
My laptop doesn't seem to do a good job. Approx 13 hours to complete one WU, compared to my Duron that takes 8 hours. My laptop has a mobile Athlon XP 1900+, but I think it's because of the 386MB SDR memory that's causing it to slow down.
Note how I cut off about 3000
)
Note how I cut off about 3000 seconds just by overclocking it to 200 extra Mhz. Well, it's not "just," more like 10% on my Athlon XP-2600 (which strangely reports as Athlon XP-2400). My goal is to get sub-20,000 second numbers on this old setup, as I'm too cheap (think college student level of poorness ;)) to get a 64-bit system like some of you. Maybe I should build another XP 2600+ system. ;)
19 Mar 2005 3:04:10 UTC 20 Mar 2005 8:16:26 UTC Over Success Done 22,187.50 89.13 78.62
18 Mar 2005 20:51:58 UTC 19 Mar 2005 22:17:23 UTC Over Success Done 22,085.27 88.72 77.90
18 Mar 2005 5:06:59 UTC 19 Mar 2005 3:04:10 UTC Over Success Done 21,608.12 86.80 74.57
17 Mar 2005 20:38:24 UTC 18 Mar 2005 20:51:58 UTC Over Success Done 22,549.13 90.59 pending
17 Mar 2005 2:41:53 UTC 18 Mar 2005 5:06:52 UTC Over Success Done 23,785.30 95.55 86.68
16 Mar 2005 0:58:32 UTC 17 Mar 2005 20:38:24 UTC Over Success Done 25,509.21 91.44 79.10
15 Mar 2005 4:11:02 UTC 17 Mar 2005 2:41:53 UTC Over Success Done 25,201.47 90.33 103.40
14 Mar 2005 6:26:06 UTC 16 Mar 2005 0:58:32 UTC Over Success Done 25,554.57 91.60 94.68
Join BOINC@California!
Dual 2.5Ghz PowerPC, OS
)
Dual 2.5Ghz PowerPC, OS 10.3.4 & 2G ram, runnung E@H.
2005-03-20 20:41:32 [---] Benchmark results:
2005-03-20 20:41:32 [---] Number of CPUs: 2
2005-03-20 20:41:32 [---] 1396 double precision MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
2005-03-20 20:41:32 [---] 4591 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
2005-03-20 20:41:32 [---] Finished CPU benchmarks
AMD ATHLON 2500XP+ Barton
)
AMD ATHLON 2500XP+ Barton core
512 meg of ram not oc'ed slowest wu 25,597 seconds
windows xp home sp2 fastest wu 25,097 seconds 16 results
AMD ATHLON
128 meg of ram
windows xp pro sp2
not oc'd 42000 seconds on average
loose -> lose dependancy ->
)
loose -> lose
dependancy -> dependency
littler -> little
independant -> independent
"My other computer is a virus farm."
> loose -> lose > dependancy
)
> loose -> lose
> dependancy -> dependency
> littler -> little
> independant -> independent
>
lysdexia -> dyslexia ;)
Join BOINC@California!
Fastest WU to be completed by
)
Fastest WU to be completed by my 2 systems so far is from my Duron, at 26,500 seconds. No, my Duron isn't overclocked and runs at 1.8GHZ.
Ok I have several WU's that
)
Ok I have several WU's that were done last night and some interesting insights.
FX53 13x203=2639Mhz
2207550 81562 21 Mar 2005 1:32:50 UTC 21 Mar 2005 10:58:16 UTC Over Success Done ...16,869.13... 70.56 pending
2187045 572354 20 Mar 2005 20:50:56 UTC 21 Mar 2005 6:15:30 UTC Over Success Done ..16,876.17... 70.59 pending
2186978 572338 20 Mar 2005 10:29:02 UTC 20 Mar 2005 23:16:56 UTC Over Success Done ...16,975.91... 71.00 pending
What I can conclude from this is MIPS is everything.
The FX53 with dual on die memory controllers and 1 mb of l2 cache has really no effect on WU performance and with that front side bus doesn't either.
Interesting enough the benchmark for the client is flawed
AAdjuster's
Benchmark results:
Number of CPUs: 1
2561 double MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
6991 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
Finished CPU benchmarks
The AAdjuster's Dhrystone benchmarks are out of wack.
The FX53's benchmarks at 2639 MHz
Measured floating point speed 2530.23 million ops/sec
Measured integer speed 4697.29 million ops/sec
These results are clearly at odds with each other.
Another interesting thing is that AAduster's credits are inflated even though the time is nearly the identical..
My claimed credts all range in the 72 area where all of his/hers are in the 90's
very strange indeed.
The Night Menace, My Einstein@Home Water Cooled PC
> Interesting enough the
)
> Interesting enough the benchmark for the client is flawed
>
> AAdjuster's
> Benchmark results:
> Number of CPUs: 1
> 2561 double MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
> 6991 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
> Finished CPU benchmarks
>
> The AAdjuster's Dhrystone benchmarks are out of wack.
>
> The FX53's benchmarks at 2639 MHz
> Measured floating point speed 2530.23 million ops/sec
> Measured integer speed 4697.29 million ops/sec
>
> These results are clearly at odds with each other.
> Another interesting thing is that AAduster's credits are inflated even though
> the time is nearly the identical..
> My claimed credts all range in the 72 area where all of his/hers are in the
> 90's
> very strange indeed.
>
I'd guess you're using 4.25 and he's using 4.19
Dominique
[edit]
Using 4.25 I get around 65. With 4.19 I used to get around 85.
*I still know CRAP when I see it.
Single AMD Opteron 144 MSI
)
Single AMD Opteron 144
MSI Master-F dual Opteron MB
1GB ECC PC2700
320GB RAID5 3Ware SATA RAID
Win 2K Pro running file shares
3181 Integer MIPS
1713 Double MIPS
Try beating that with a $250 chip from Intel.
I can't imagine what a dual 250 would do, much less an 8-way 852. *drool*
My laptop doesn't seem to do
)
My laptop doesn't seem to do a good job. Approx 13 hours to complete one WU, compared to my Duron that takes 8 hours. My laptop has a mobile Athlon XP 1900+, but I think it's because of the 386MB SDR memory that's causing it to slow down.