MacOS PPC Beta Test App 4.56 available

Martin P.
Martin P.
Joined: 17 Feb 05
Posts: 162
Credit: 40,156,217
RAC: 0

RE: From your link, I've

Message 30372 in response to message 30371

Quote:
From your link, I've replaced my CLI superbench 5.2.13 with 5.4.9 within BOINC Manager of the former version. Both reads their version respectively and they run fine. Are there any implications of such action toward the project....?

Elphidieus,

I installed the regular 5.4.9 client first and then replaced the client within 5.4.9 with the SuperBench version. All 3 WUs validated o.k. so far.

Penguirl
Penguirl
Joined: 30 Aug 05
Posts: 8
Credit: 1,745,549
RAC: 0

RE: Hi ChillyWilly, you

Message 30373 in response to message 30370

Quote:


Hi ChillyWilly,

you can find the 5.4.9 SuperBench client for Panther here: 5.4.9 Universal Clients


Thanks Martin, I checked it the other day and it was still Tiger only. I appreciate the link!

Chris

Odysseus
Odysseus
Joined: 17 Dec 05
Posts: 372
Credit: 20,458,124
RAC: 6,075

Just reporting that I’ve

Just reporting that I’ve now completed six WUs on my G4/733 using v4.56, all valid. I’m deploying the app on my other two Macs, which are G4/400s.

Penguirl
Penguirl
Joined: 30 Aug 05
Posts: 8
Credit: 1,745,549
RAC: 0

OK, one more question. I see

OK, one more question. I see that the BOINC_5.4.9SuperBenchUniversal for Panther is a CLI client that is GUI compatable. Does that mean that I can somehow integrate it into Berkeley's stock build, or do I have to run it from Terminal? After decompression, I have a 1.4 MB document that I don't know what to do with and I'm woefully inept in Terminal.

(Edit) If all else fails, Google it! Looks good so far, I can't wait to finish my cache of SETI 4.18 WU's and get busy crunching Einstein WU's!

Thanks again for pointing out that the Panther version had been posted.

MarkF
MarkF
Joined: 12 Apr 05
Posts: 393
Credit: 1,516,715
RAC: 0

Any updates regarding

Any updates regarding G5-11,2-ppc970s?

Bernd Machenschalk
Bernd Machenschalk
Moderator
Administrator
Joined: 15 Oct 04
Posts: 4,308
Credit: 249,855,500
RAC: 32,190

RE: Any updates regarding

Message 30377 in response to message 30376

Quote:
Any updates regarding G5-11,2-ppc970s?


Gaurav Khanna, who also contributed to the AltiVec code of the official App, claims that the very same (source) code I am using compiles into an App that runs about 30% faster on his G5 than the 4.56 App. We're both using the same Xcode version and the same compiler flags - and are both plexed at the difference. This definitely needs further investigation, but there are also some other urgent tasks to do.

BM

BM

Elphidieus
Elphidieus
Joined: 20 Feb 05
Posts: 245
Credit: 20,603,702
RAC: 0

RE: RE: Any updates

Message 30378 in response to message 30377

Quote:
Quote:
Any updates regarding G5-11,2-ppc970s?

Gaurav Khanna, who also contributed to the AltiVec code of the official App, claims that the very same (source) code I am using compiles into an App that runs about 30% faster on his G5 than the 4.56 App. We're both using the same Xcode version and the same compiler flags - and are both plexed at the difference. This definitely needs further investigation, but there are also some other urgent tasks to do.

BM

For a scenario, a G5 1.9GHz with a 10,000 sec LWU on 4.39 and 4.56. After recompile, 30% faster = 7,000 sec....

Crappy P4 2.4 GHz fanless heatsink system running ThreadMaster at 65% capacity, completes a 4500 sec LWU at ~ 7000 sec.....

Is there really no hope for Altivec, or Einstein's sucks at Altivec optimisation....?

Damn, I hate Intel for swaying Apple on the switch...!!!

MarkF
MarkF
Joined: 12 Apr 05
Posts: 393
Credit: 1,516,715
RAC: 0

Bernd: I understand thanks

Bernd:
I understand thanks for the update.

Odysseus
Odysseus
Joined: 17 Dec 05
Posts: 372
Credit: 20,458,124
RAC: 6,075

RE: Damn, I hate Intel for

Message 30380 in response to message 30378

Quote:
Damn, I hate Intel for swaying Apple on the switch...!!!


You might also blame Motorola and IBM, for failing to meet Apple’s requirements …

Elphidieus
Elphidieus
Joined: 20 Feb 05
Posts: 245
Credit: 20,603,702
RAC: 0

RE: You might also blame

Message 30381 in response to message 30380

Quote:

You might also blame Motorola and IBM, for failing to meet Apple’s requirements …

And should I blame you as well for the double standards....?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.