Graphics card performances

robertmiles
robertmiles
Joined: 8 Oct 09
Posts: 127
Credit: 21364715
RAC: 25460
Topic 198330

I believe that E@H GPU workunits make heavy use of the GPU's double precision. Is this correct?

It looks like I may have a chance to replace one of my computers, using a GTX 560, with a newer computer using a GTX 980, although not very soon. Where can I find information comparing the double precision capability of these two graphics boards?

David S
David S
Joined: 6 Dec 05
Posts: 2473
Credit: 22936222
RAC: 0

Graphics card performances

Quote:

I believe that E@H GPU workunits make heavy use of the GPU's double precision. Is this correct?

It looks like I may have a chance to replace one of my computers, using a GTX 560, with a newer computer using a GTX 980, although not very soon. Where can I find information comparing the double precision capability of these two graphics boards?


Probably better to ask in Cruncher's Corner than in the Cafe.

David

Miserable old git
Patiently waiting for the asteroid with my name on it.

Zalster
Zalster
Joined: 26 Nov 13
Posts: 3117
Credit: 4050672230
RAC: 0

You might want to read this

You might want to read this thread

http://einsteinathome.org/node/197801&postid=134933

Einstein is single precision so double precision isn't as important.

The 560 is a double precision, the 980 is a single precision.

robertmiles
robertmiles
Joined: 8 Oct 09
Posts: 127
Credit: 21364715
RAC: 25460

RE: You might want to read

Quote:

You might want to read this thread

http://einsteinathome.org/node/197801&postid=134933

Einstein is single precision so double precision isn't as important.

The 560 is a double precision, the 980 is a single precision.

I'll need to repeat the question at some other BOINC project, then. At least one of the BOINC projects my computers participate in makes heavy use of double precision, and I don't want to decrease my ability to participate in that one or those.

Richard Haselgrove
Richard Haselgrove
Joined: 10 Dec 05
Posts: 2142
Credit: 2774755751
RAC: 837396

RE: I'll need to repeat the

Quote:
I'll need to repeat the question at some other BOINC project, then. At least one of the BOINC projects my computers participate in makes heavy use of double precision, and I don't want to decrease my ability to participate in that one or those.


The most widely cited "double precision required" project is MilkyWay@Home - where I see you've already posted.

Chris S
Chris S
Joined: 27 Aug 05
Posts: 2469
Credit: 19550265
RAC: 0

Try this one .... Titan

Try this one ....

Titan

Waiting for Godot & salvation :-)

Why do doctors have to practice?
You'd think they'd have got it right by now

mikey
mikey
Joined: 22 Jan 05
Posts: 11971
Credit: 1834058493
RAC: 225691

RE: RE: You might want to

Quote:
Quote:

You might want to read this thread

http://einsteinathome.org/node/197801&postid=134933

Einstein is single precision so double precision isn't as important.

The 560 is a double precision, the 980 is a single precision.

I'll need to repeat the question at some other BOINC project, then. At least one of the BOINC projects my computers participate in makes heavy use of double precision, and I don't want to decrease my ability to participate in that one or those.

I posted this link at MilkyWay:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nvidia_graphics_processing_units#Compute_capability_table

It's a place to start at least.

robertmiles
robertmiles
Joined: 8 Oct 09
Posts: 127
Credit: 21364715
RAC: 25460

RE: Try this one

Quote:

Try this one ....

Titan

If I had access to more power for the planned location of those computers, I might. I don't.

robertmiles
robertmiles
Joined: 8 Oct 09
Posts: 127
Credit: 21364715
RAC: 25460

RE: RE: RE: You might

Quote:
Quote:
Quote:

You might want to read this thread

http://einsteinathome.org/node/197801&postid=134933

Einstein is single precision so double precision isn't as important.

The 560 is a double precision, the 980 is a single precision.

I'll need to repeat the question at some other BOINC project, then. At least one of the BOINC projects my computers participate in makes heavy use of double precision, and I don't want to decrease my ability to participate in that one or those.

I posted this link at MilkyWay:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nvidia_graphics_processing_units#Compute_capability_table

It's a place to start at least.

It helped enough. It shows that the GTX 980 can do double precision, and more than the GTX 560 can, but not as much more as some people would expect from the ratio of their single precision performances.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.