EM searches, BRP Raidiopulsar and FGRP Gamma-Ray Pulsar

Filipe
Filipe
Joined: 10 Mar 05
Posts: 180
Credit: 375,676,022
RAC: 112,470

FGRPB1G now shows on the

FGRPB1G now shows on the server status page as 36 Millions units remaining:

FGRPB1G search progress

Total needed Already done Work still remaining
175,921,402 units 139,835,162 units 36,086,240 units
2617.4 days 2163.2 days 454.2 days (estimated)

 

 

 

   

Keith Myers wrote:

No not official.  They just have advised that the Gamma Ray Pulsar search was winding down back in summer and only a few more months of work was available.  Then because they didn't get the BRP7 campaign ramped up as fast as they expected, they prolonged the GR#1 task generation for bit longer.

The scarcity of tasks is just because they haven't recovered the computers that do the pre-processing of those tasks from the last system wide project failure.

The end of these tasks could come at a moment's notice however.  I would start making plans for other work for your host.

Ian&Steve C.
Ian&Steve C.
Joined: 19 Jan 20
Posts: 3,833
Credit: 38,679,011,826
RAC: 63,532,200

Filipe wrote: FGRPB1G now

Filipe wrote:

FGRPB1G now shows on the server status page as 36 Millions units remaining:

FGRPB1G search progress

Total needed Already done Work still remaining
175,921,402 units 139,835,162 units 36,086,240 units
2617.4 days 2163.2 days 454.2 days (estimated)

     

 

 

Nice to see that tracker back. Let's get it done!

_________________________________________________________________________

Filipe
Filipe
Joined: 10 Mar 05
Posts: 180
Credit: 375,676,022
RAC: 112,470

Astonishing! With all our

Astonishing! With all our combined GPU power is going to take about 1 year to finish them off?

Boca Raton Community HS
Boca Raton Comm...
Joined: 4 Nov 15
Posts: 216
Credit: 8,612,916,738
RAC: 1,118,373

Speaking of this, we are

Speaking of this, we are going to be mainly offline for the next two weeks due to the holidays. The AC is usually not on in the buildings during this time, so I will only leave the cooler running hosts on. 

I am not saying we (Boca Raton HS) have much of an impact on the overall timeline of these tasks, but we know every little bit helps. 

tictoc
tictoc
Joined: 1 Jan 13
Posts: 38
Credit: 6,269,630,599
RAC: 5,430,699

I am back running MeerKAT on

I am back running MeerKAT on a pair of Radeon VIIs.  The invalid rate is about 5-6%.  Is this invalid rate within the expected range? https://einsteinathome.org/host/12883788/tasks/5/0

No obvious pattern on the invalids after a quick look through the results.  Mostly Windows CUDA wingmen, but also a handful of invalids against Windows AMD and Linux hosts.

mikey
mikey
Joined: 22 Jan 05
Posts: 12,258
Credit: 1,838,178,424
RAC: 12,569

Filipe wrote: Astonishing!

Filipe wrote:

Astonishing! With all our combined GPU power is going to take about 1 year to finish them off? 

Obviously it would be alot faster if they were the only tasks available

Marcin
Marcin
Joined: 19 Jun 09
Posts: 20
Credit: 6,438,694
RAC: 4,980

I've noticed recently on the

I've noticed recently on the status page in the BRP section that strange negative values started showing up for Arecibo again
Does this mean arecibo data needs re-crunching ? GBT times started to fall behind too - wondering why....

GBT 22,031,744 994,729 11,210 89
Arecibo 140,611,327 -749,721 201,419 -4
mikey
mikey
Joined: 22 Jan 05
Posts: 12,258
Credit: 1,838,178,424
RAC: 12,569

Marcin wrote: I've noticed

Marcin wrote:

I've noticed recently on the status page in the BRP section that strange negative values started showing up for Arecibo again
Does this mean arecibo data needs re-crunching ? GBT times started to fall behind too - wondering why....

GBT 22,031,744 994,729 11,210 89
Arecibo 140,611,327 -749,721 201,419 -4

I'm guessing the GBT times are because of this and will start changing if they really have run out of tasks:

O3MD search progress

  Total WUs WUs left WUs last day days left
O3MD1 1,719,170 0 0 0
O3MDF 6,207,899 0 0 0

 

Link
Link
Joined: 15 Mar 20
Posts: 104
Credit: 2,282,554
RAC: 30,598

Marcin wrote:I've noticed

Marcin wrote:

I've noticed recently on the status page in the BRP section that strange negative values started showing up for Arecibo again
Does this mean arecibo data needs re-crunching ? GBT times started to fall behind too - wondering why....

GBT 22,031,744 994,729 11,210 89
Arecibo 140,611,327 -749,721 201,419 -4

Until now all available ressources for BRP4 were used for GBT, so it is slowing down now because part of those ressources are used for Arecibo tasks now. The total of Arecibo tasks has not been increased when the new ones were released, that's why the script is showing weird values. At least that's my theory about what we see there.

.

Bernd Machenschalk
Bernd Machenschalk
Moderator
Administrator
Joined: 15 Oct 04
Posts: 4,296
Credit: 246,136,940
RAC: 10,803

I have to admit that the BRP

I have to admit that the BRP progress counting doesn't work so well, in particular the communication with the pre-processing. The GBT beams that aren't finished yet were sorted out by the pre-processing, because it was detected that these wouldn't process well on E@H (too much RFI). OTOH we found some more Arecibo beams needed to be processed (again), these are not yet counted in the total Arecibo beams. I'll fix that as soon as I get the necessary information.

BM

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.