Snagged my 1st one last night, running on my i7. Its estimating 9 hours 25 mins to process. The All Sky GW ones are between 6 and 7 hours. Will have a better idea once its crunched it.
Snagged my 1st one last night, running on my i7. Its estimating 9 hours 25 mins to process. The All Sky GW ones are between 6 and 7 hours. Will have a better idea once its crunched it.
The initial estimate for the one I got and have now completed was accurate. Completed in ~6.5hrs on q6600 @3GHz.
Snagged my 1st one last night, running on my i7. Its estimating 9 hours 25 mins to process. The All Sky GW ones are between 6 and 7 hours. Will have a better idea once its crunched it.
It took the i7 8:41 to process it. One of my quaddies (Q6600 @ 2.4Ghz) got a bunch of them and they took 7:45 each.
I have one that's completed, and has been unsuccessfully trying to upload for the last several hours. Yet, the regular Einstein workunits have been uploading okay. Has anyone else had this problem?
One ran in 7:30 on my stock (2.4 GHz) E6600 Conroe-generation host
Another ran in 6:22 on my stock Q9550 (2.83 GHz) (Penryn-generation)
I had one or two error out when I was not around for their first run. The firewall I run (Comodo) asks me to authorize first run of new executables. I don't know how long the period of grace is before it errors out, but it appears to be no more than a couple of minutes.
I returned several of them already and they validated o.k. Although they take much longer (32,000 sec. vs. 25,000 sec. both on 8-core MacPro Nehalem 2.66) they receive much less credit (160 vs. appr. 189).
I returned several of them already and they validated o.k. Although they take much longer (32,000 sec. vs. 25,000 sec. both on 8-core MacPro Nehalem 2.66) they receive much less credit (160 vs. appr. 189).
I detached them for now.
Yes, the credit inequality has been noted by another user as well, see the dedicated thread for this. The credits will be re-calibrated soon to get a better match between the two searches, stay tuned.
Arecibo Binary Pulsar Search 3.03
)
See front page news and the sticky threads "Searching for pulsars in PALFA data from Arecibo" in Science and Problems & Bug Reports message boards.
BM
BM
Snagged my 1st one last
)
Snagged my 1st one last night, running on my i7. Its estimating 9 hours 25 mins to process. The All Sky GW ones are between 6 and 7 hours. Will have a better idea once its crunched it.
BOINC blog
RE: Snagged my 1st one last
)
The initial estimate for the one I got and have now completed was accurate. Completed in ~6.5hrs on q6600 @3GHz.
downloaded two here
)
downloaded two here estimated run time is 30+ hours on a Pentium 4
I think there's a world market for maybe five computers - Thomas Watson, IBM
RE: Snagged my 1st one last
)
It took the i7 8:41 to process it. One of my quaddies (Q6600 @ 2.4Ghz) got a bunch of them and they took 7:45 each.
BOINC blog
I have one that's completed,
)
I have one that's completed, and has been unsuccessfully trying to upload for the last several hours. Yet, the regular Einstein workunits have been uploading okay. Has anyone else had this problem?
Hi! The project admins
)
Hi!
The project admins were made aware of the problem, thanks for the reports!
Bikeman
One ran in 7:30 on my stock
)
One ran in 7:30 on my stock (2.4 GHz) E6600 Conroe-generation host
Another ran in 6:22 on my stock Q9550 (2.83 GHz) (Penryn-generation)
I had one or two error out when I was not around for their first run. The firewall I run (Comodo) asks me to authorize first run of new executables. I don't know how long the period of grace is before it errors out, but it appears to be no more than a couple of minutes.
I returned several of them
)
I returned several of them already and they validated o.k. Although they take much longer (32,000 sec. vs. 25,000 sec. both on 8-core MacPro Nehalem 2.66) they receive much less credit (160 vs. appr. 189).
I detached them for now.
RE: I returned several of
)
Yes, the credit inequality has been noted by another user as well, see the dedicated thread for this. The credits will be re-calibrated soon to get a better match between the two searches, stay tuned.
Thanks for reporting this
Bikeman